perf(authorizer): preload access control lists (#1640)

* adjust session refresh to always occur (for disabled users)

* feat: adds filtering option for Request Method in ACL's

* simplify flow of internal/authorization/authorizer.go's methods

* implement query string checking

* utilize authorizer.Object fully

* make matchers uniform

* add tests

* add missing request methods

* add frontend enhancements to handle request method

* add request method to 1FA Handler Suite

* add internal ACL representations (preparsing)

* expand on access_control next

* add docs

* remove unnecessary slice for network names and instead just use a plain string

* add warning for ineffectual bypass policy (due to subjects)

* add user/group wildcard support

* fix(authorization): allow subject rules to match anonymous users

* feat(api): add new params

* docs(api): wording adjustments

* test: add request method into testing and proxy docs

* test: add several checks and refactor schema validation for ACL

* test: add integration test for methods acl

* refactor: apply suggestions from code review

* docs(authorization): update description

api/openapi.yml

@@ -73,14 +73,9 @@ paths:
       summary: Verification
       description: The verify endpoint provides the ability to verify if a user has the necessary permissions to access a specified domain.
       parameters:
-        - name: X-Original-URL
+        - $ref: '#/components/parameters/originalURLParam'
-          in: header
+        - $ref: '#/components/parameters/forwardedMethodParam'
-          description: Redirection URL
+        - $ref: '#/components/parameters/authParam'
-          required: true
-          style: simple
-          explode: true
-          schema:
-            type: string
       responses:
         "200":
           description: Successful Operation
@@ -115,14 +110,9 @@ paths:
       summary: Verification
       description: The verify endpoint provides the ability to verify if a user has the necessary permissions to access a specified domain.
       parameters:
-        - name: X-Original-URL
+        - $ref: '#/components/parameters/originalURLParam'
-          in: header
+        - $ref: '#/components/parameters/forwardedMethodParam'
-          description: Redirection URL
+        - $ref: '#/components/parameters/authParam'
-          required: true
-          style: simple
-          explode: true
-          schema:
-            type: string
       responses:
         "200":
           description: Successful Operation
@@ -481,6 +471,34 @@ paths:
       security:
         - authelia_auth: []
 components:
+  parameters:
+    originalURLParam:
+      name: X-Original-URL
+      in: header
+      description: Redirection URL
+      required: true
+      style: simple
+      explode: true
+      schema:
+        type: string
+    forwardedMethodParam:
+      name: X-Forwarded-Method
+      in: header
+      description: Request Method
+      required: false
+      style: simple
+      explode: true
+      schema:
+        type: string
+        enum: ["GET", "HEAD", "POST", "PUT", "PATCH", "DELETE", "TRACE", "CONNECT", "OPTIONS"]
+    authParam:
+      name: auth
+      in: query
+      description: Switch authorization header and prompt for basic auth
+      required: false
+      schema:
+        type: string
+        enum: ["basic"]
   schemas:
     handlers.configuration.ConfigurationBody:
       type: object
@@ -517,6 +535,9 @@ components:
         targetURL:
           type: string
           example: https://home.example.com
+        requestMethod:
+          type: string
+          example: GET
         keepMeLoggedIn:
           type: boolean
           example: true

docs/configuration/access-control.md

@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ nav_order: 1
 # Access Control
 {: .no_toc }
 
-## Access Control List
+## Policies
 
 With **Authelia** you can define a list of rules that are going to be evaluated in
 sequential order when authorization is delegated to Authelia.
@@ -16,8 +16,46 @@ sequential order when authorization is delegated to Authelia.
 The first matching rule of the list defines the policy applied to the resource, if
 no rule matches the resource a customizable default policy is applied.
 
+### deny
 
-## Access Control Rule
+This is the policy applied by default, and is what we recommend as the default policy for all installs. Its effect
+is literally to deny the user access to the resource. Additionally you can use this policy to conditionally deny 
+access in desired situations. Examples include denying access to an API that has no authentication mechanism built in.
+
+### bypass
+
+This policy skips all authentication and allows anyone to use the resource. This policy is not available with a rule
+that includes a [subject](#Subjects) restriction because the minimum authentication level required to obtain information 
+about the subject is [one_factor](#one_factor).
+
+### one_factor
+
+This policy requires the user at minimum complete 1FA successfully (username and password). This means if they have 
+performed 2FA then they will be allowed to access the resource.
+
+### two_factor
+
+This policy requires the user to complete 2FA successfully. This is currently the highest level of authentication
+policy available.
+
+## Default Policy
+
+The default policy is the policy applied when no other rule matches. It is recommended that this is configured to 
+[deny](#deny) for security reasons. Sites which you do not wish to secure with Authelia should not be configured to 
+perform authentication with Authelia at all.
+
+See [Policies](#policies) for more information.
+
+## Network Aliases
+
+The main networks section defines a list of network aliases, where the name matches a list of networks. These names can
+be used in any [rule](#rules) instead of a literal network. This makes it easier to define a group of networks multiple
+times.
+
+You can combine both literal networks and these aliases inside the [networks](#networks) section of a rule. See this
+section for more details.
+
+## Rules
 
 A rule defines two things:
 
@@ -26,29 +64,24 @@ A rule defines two things:
 
 The criteria are:
 
-* domain: domain targeted by the request.
+* domain: domain or list of domains targeted by the request.
-* resources: list of patterns that the path should match (one is sufficient).
+* resources: pattern or list of patterns that the path should match.
 * subject: the user or group of users to define the policy for.
 * networks: the network addresses, ranges (CIDR notation) or groups from where the request originates.
+* methods: the http methods used in the request.
 
-A rule is matched when all criteria of the rule match.
+A rule is matched when all criteria of the rule match. Rules are evaluated in sequential order, and this is
+particularly **important** for bypass rules. Bypass rules should generally appear near the top of the rules list.
 
 
-## Policies
+### Policy
 
 A policy represents the level of authentication the user needs to pass before
 being authorized to request the resource.
 
-There exist 4 policies:
+See [Policies](#policies) for more information.
 
-* bypass: the resource is public as the user does not need any authentication to
+### Domains
-get access to it.
-* one_factor: the user needs to pass at least the first factor to get access to
-the resource.
-* two_factor: the user needs to pass two factors to get access to the resource.
-* deny: the user does not have access to the resource.
-
-## Domains
 
 The domains defined in rules must obviously be either a subdomain of the domain
 protected by Authelia or the protected domain itself. In order to match multiple
@@ -58,7 +91,12 @@ For instance, to define a rule for all subdomains of *example.com*, one would us
 These domains can be either listed in YAML-short form `["example1.com", "example2.com"]`
 or in YAML long-form as dashed list.
 
-## Resources
+Domain prefixes can also be dynamically match users or groups. For example you can have a 
+specific policy adjustment if the user or group matches the subdomain. For
+example `{user}.example.com` or `{group}.example.com` check the users name or 
+groups against the subdomain.
+
+### Resources
 
 A rule can define multiple regular expressions for matching the path of the resource
 similar to the list of domains. If any one of them matches, the resource criteria of
@@ -72,7 +110,7 @@ when you are using regular expressions, you enclose them between quotes. It's op
 it will likely save you a lot of debugging time.
 
 
-## Subjects
+### Subjects
 
 A subject is a representation of a user or a group of user for who the rule should apply.
 
@@ -86,20 +124,52 @@ In summary, the first list level of subjects are evaluated using a logical `OR`,
 second level by a logical `AND`. The last example below reads as: the group is `dev` AND the
 username is `john` OR the group is `admins`.
 
-## Networks
+#### Combining subjects and the bypass policy
+
+A subject cannot be combined with the `bypass` policy since the minimum authentication level to identify a subject is
+`one_factor`. Combining the `one_factor` policy with a subject is effectively the same as setting the policy to `bypass`
+in the past. We have taken an opinionated stance on preventing this configuration as it could result in problematic
+security scenarios with badly thought out configurations and cannot see a likely configuration scenario that would 
+require users to do this. If you have a scenario in mind please open an 
+[issue](https://github.com/authelia/authelia/issues/new) on GitHub.
+
+### Networks
 
 A list of network addresses, ranges (CIDR notation) or groups can be specified in a rule in order to apply different
-policies when requests originate from different networks.
+policies when requests originate from different networks. This list can contain both literal definitions of networks
+and [network aliases](#network-aliases).
 
-The main use case is when, lets say a resource should be exposed both on the Internet and from an
+Main use cases for this rule option is to adjust the security requirements of a resource based on the location of
+the user. For example lets say a resource should be exposed both on the Internet and from an
 authenticated VPN for instance. Passing a second factor a first time to get access to the VPN and
 a second time to get access to the application can sometimes be cumbersome if the endpoint is not
 considered overly sensitive.
 
+An additional situation where this may be useful is if there is a specific network you wish to deny access
+or require a higher level of authentication for; like a public machine network vs a company device network, or a 
+BYOD network.
+
 Even if Authelia provides this flexibility, you might prefer a higher level of security and avoid
 this option entirely. You and only you can define your security policy and it's up to you to
 configure Authelia accordingly.
 
+### Methods
+
+A list of HTTP request methods to apply the rule to. Valid values are GET, HEAD, POST, PUT, DELETE, 
+CONNECT, OPTIONS, and TRACE. Additional information about HTTP request methods can be found on the 
+[MDN](https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTTP/Methods).
+
+It's important to note this policy type is primarily intended for use when you wish to bypass authentication for
+a specific request method. This is because there are several key limitations in what is possible to accomplish
+without Authelia being a reverse proxy server. This rule type is discouraged unless you really know what you're
+doing or you wish to setup a rule to bypass CORS preflight requests by bypassing for the OPTIONS method.
+
+For example, if you require authentication only for write events (POST, PATCH, DELETE, PUT), when a user who is not
+currently authenticated tries to do one of these actions, they will be redirected to Authelia. Authelia will decide
+what level is required for authentication, and then after the user authenticates it will redirect them to the original
+URL where Authelia decided they needed to authenticate. So if the endpoint they are redirected to originally had
+data sent as part of the request, this data is completely lost. Further if the endpoint expects the data or doesn't allow
+GET request types, the user may be presented with an error leading to a bad user experience.
 
 ## Complete example
 
@@ -119,6 +189,11 @@ access_control:
     - domain: public.example.com
       policy: bypass
 
+    - domain: "*.example.com"
+      policy: bypass
+      methods:
+        - OPTIONS
+
     - domain: secure.example.com
       policy: one_factor
       networks:
@@ -158,4 +233,7 @@ access_control:
       - ["group:dev", "user:john"]
       - "group:admins"
       policy: two_factor
+
+    - domain: "{user}.example.com"
+      policy: bypass
 ```

docs/deployment/supported-proxies/haproxy.md

@@ -102,8 +102,21 @@ frontend fe_http
     http-request set-var(req.scheme) str(http) if !{ ssl_fc }
     http-request set-var(req.questionmark) str(?) if { query -m found }
    
+    # These are optional if you wish to use the Methods rule in the access_control section.
+    #http-request set-var(req.method) str(CONNECT) if { method CONNECT }
+    #http-request set-var(req.method) str(GET) if { method GET }
+    #http-request set-var(req.method) str(HEAD) if { method HEAD }
+    #http-request set-var(req.method) str(OPTIONS) if { method OPTIONS }
+    #http-request set-var(req.method) str(POST) if { method POST }
+    #http-request set-var(req.method) str(TRACE) if { method TRACE }
+    #http-request set-var(req.method) str(PUT) if { method PUT }
+    #http-request set-var(req.method) str(PATCH) if { method PATCH }
+    #http-request set-var(req.method) str(DELETE) if { method DELETE }
+    #http-request set-header X-Forwarded-Method %[var(req.method)]
+
     # Required headers
     http-request set-header X-Real-IP %[src]
+    http-request set-header X-Forwarded-Method %[var(req.method)]
     http-request set-header X-Forwarded-Proto %[var(req.scheme)]
     http-request set-header X-Forwarded-Host %[req.hdr(Host)]
     http-request set-header X-Forwarded-Uri %[path]%[var(req.questionmark)]%[query]
@@ -179,7 +192,19 @@ frontend fe_http
     http-request set-var(req.scheme) str(https) if { ssl_fc }
     http-request set-var(req.scheme) str(http) if !{ ssl_fc }
     http-request set-var(req.questionmark) str(?) if { query -m found }
-   
+    
+    # These are optional if you wish to use the Methods rule in the access_control section.
+    #http-request set-var(req.method) str(CONNECT) if { method CONNECT }
+    #http-request set-var(req.method) str(GET) if { method GET }
+    #http-request set-var(req.method) str(HEAD) if { method HEAD }
+    #http-request set-var(req.method) str(OPTIONS) if { method OPTIONS }
+    #http-request set-var(req.method) str(POST) if { method POST }
+    #http-request set-var(req.method) str(TRACE) if { method TRACE }
+    #http-request set-var(req.method) str(PUT) if { method PUT }
+    #http-request set-var(req.method) str(PATCH) if { method PATCH }
+    #http-request set-var(req.method) str(DELETE) if { method DELETE }
+    #http-request set-header X-Forwarded-Method %[var(req.method)]
+    
     # Required headers
     http-request set-header X-Real-IP %[src]
     http-request set-header X-Forwarded-Proto %[var(req.scheme)]

docs/deployment/supported-proxies/nginx.md

@@ -48,10 +48,11 @@ location /authelia {
     proxy_set_header Host $host;
     proxy_set_header X-Original-URL $scheme://$http_host$request_uri;
     proxy_set_header X-Real-IP $remote_addr;
-    proxy_set_header X-Forwarded-For $remote_addr;
+    proxy_set_header X-Forwarded-Method $request_method;
     proxy_set_header X-Forwarded-Proto $scheme;
     proxy_set_header X-Forwarded-Host $http_host;
     proxy_set_header X-Forwarded-Uri $request_uri;
+    proxy_set_header X-Forwarded-For $remote_addr;
     proxy_set_header X-Forwarded-Ssl on;
     proxy_redirect  http://  $scheme://;
     proxy_http_version 1.1;
@@ -208,10 +209,11 @@ location /authelia {
     proxy_set_header Host $host;
     proxy_set_header X-Original-URL $scheme://$http_host$request_uri;
     proxy_set_header X-Real-IP $remote_addr;
-    proxy_set_header X-Forwarded-For $remote_addr;
+    proxy_set_header X-Forwarded-Method $request_method;
     proxy_set_header X-Forwarded-Proto $scheme;
     proxy_set_header X-Forwarded-Host $http_host;
     proxy_set_header X-Forwarded-Uri $request_uri;
+    proxy_set_header X-Forwarded-For $remote_addr;
     proxy_set_header X-Forwarded-Ssl on;
     proxy_redirect  http://  $scheme://;
     proxy_http_version 1.1;

internal/authorization/access_control_domain.go

@@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
+package authorization
+
+import (
+	"fmt"
+	"strings"
+
+	"github.com/authelia/authelia/internal/utils"
+)
+
+// AccessControlDomain represents an ACL domain.
+type AccessControlDomain struct {
+	Name          string
+	Wildcard      bool
+	UserWildcard  bool
+	GroupWildcard bool
+}
+
+// IsMatch returns true if the ACL domain matches the object domain.
+func (acd AccessControlDomain) IsMatch(subject Subject, object Object) (match bool) {
+	switch {
+	case acd.Wildcard:
+		return strings.HasSuffix(object.Domain, acd.Name)
+	case acd.UserWildcard:
+		return object.Domain == fmt.Sprintf("%s.%s", subject.Username, acd.Name)
+	case acd.GroupWildcard:
+		prefix, suffix := domainToPrefixSuffix(object.Domain)
+
+		return suffix == acd.Name && utils.IsStringInSliceFold(prefix, subject.Groups)
+	default:
+		return object.Domain == acd.Name
+	}
+}

internal/authorization/access_control_resource.go

@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+package authorization
+
+import (
+	"regexp"
+)
+
+// AccessControlResource represents an ACL resource.
+type AccessControlResource struct {
+	Pattern *regexp.Regexp
+}
+
+// IsMatch returns true if the ACL resource match the object path.
+func (acr AccessControlResource) IsMatch(object Object) (match bool) {
+	return acr.Pattern.MatchString(object.Path)
+}

internal/authorization/access_control_rule.go

@@ -0,0 +1,139 @@
+package authorization
+
+import (
+	"net"
+
+	"github.com/authelia/authelia/internal/configuration/schema"
+	"github.com/authelia/authelia/internal/utils"
+)
+
+// NewAccessControlRules converts a schema.AccessControlConfiguration into an AccessControlRule slice.
+func NewAccessControlRules(config schema.AccessControlConfiguration) (rules []*AccessControlRule) {
+	networksMap, networksCacheMap := parseSchemaNetworks(config.Networks)
+
+	for _, schemaRule := range config.Rules {
+		rules = append(rules, NewAccessControlRule(schemaRule, networksMap, networksCacheMap))
+	}
+
+	return rules
+}
+
+// NewAccessControlRule parses a schema ACL and generates an internal ACL.
+func NewAccessControlRule(rule schema.ACLRule, networksMap map[string][]*net.IPNet, networksCacheMap map[string]*net.IPNet) *AccessControlRule {
+	return &AccessControlRule{
+		Domains:   schemaDomainsToACL(rule.Domains),
+		Resources: schemaResourcesToACL(rule.Resources),
+		Methods:   schemaMethodsToACL(rule.Methods),
+		Networks:  schemaNetworksToACL(rule.Networks, networksMap, networksCacheMap),
+		Subjects:  schemaSubjectsToACL(rule.Subjects),
+		Policy:    PolicyToLevel(rule.Policy),
+	}
+}
+
+// AccessControlRule controls and represents an ACL internally.
+type AccessControlRule struct {
+	Domains   []AccessControlDomain
+	Resources []AccessControlResource
+	Methods   []string
+	Networks  []*net.IPNet
+	Subjects  []AccessControlSubjects
+	Policy    Level
+}
+
+// IsMatch returns true if all elements of an AccessControlRule match the object and subject.
+func (acr *AccessControlRule) IsMatch(subject Subject, object Object) (match bool) {
+	if !isMatchForDomains(subject, object, acr) {
+		return false
+	}
+
+	if !isMatchForResources(object, acr) {
+		return false
+	}
+
+	if !isMatchForMethods(object, acr) {
+		return false
+	}
+
+	if !isMatchForNetworks(subject, acr) {
+		return false
+	}
+
+	if !isMatchForSubjects(subject, acr) {
+		return false
+	}
+
+	return true
+}
+
+func isMatchForDomains(subject Subject, object Object, acl *AccessControlRule) (match bool) {
+	// If there are no domains in this rule then the domain condition is a match.
+	if len(acl.Domains) == 0 {
+		return true
+	}
+
+	// Iterate over the domains until we find a match (return true) or until we exit the loop (return false).
+	for _, domain := range acl.Domains {
+		if domain.IsMatch(subject, object) {
+			return true
+		}
+	}
+
+	return false
+}
+
+func isMatchForResources(object Object, acl *AccessControlRule) (match bool) {
+	// If there are no resources in this rule then the resource condition is a match.
+	if len(acl.Resources) == 0 {
+		return true
+	}
+
+	// Iterate over the resources until we find a match (return true) or until we exit the loop (return false).
+	for _, resource := range acl.Resources {
+		if resource.IsMatch(object) {
+			return true
+		}
+	}
+
+	return false
+}
+
+func isMatchForMethods(object Object, acl *AccessControlRule) (match bool) {
+	// If there are no methods in this rule then the method condition is a match.
+	if len(acl.Methods) == 0 {
+		return true
+	}
+
+	return utils.IsStringInSlice(object.Method, acl.Methods)
+}
+
+func isMatchForNetworks(subject Subject, acl *AccessControlRule) (match bool) {
+	// If there are no networks in this rule then the network condition is a match.
+	if len(acl.Networks) == 0 {
+		return true
+	}
+
+	// Iterate over the networks until we find a match (return true) or until we exit the loop (return false).
+	for _, network := range acl.Networks {
+		if network.Contains(subject.IP) {
+			return true
+		}
+	}
+
+	return false
+}
+
+func isMatchForSubjects(subject Subject, acl *AccessControlRule) (match bool) {
+	// If there are no subjects in this rule then the subject condition is a match.
+	if len(acl.Subjects) == 0 || subject.IsAnonymous() {
+		return true
+	}
+
+	// Iterate over the subjects until we find a match (return true) or until we exit the loop (return false).
+	for _, subjectRule := range acl.Subjects {
+		if subjectRule.IsMatch(subject) {
+			return true
+		}
+	}
+
+	return false
+}

internal/authorization/access_control_subjects.go

@@ -0,0 +1,55 @@
+package authorization
+
+import (
+	"github.com/authelia/authelia/internal/utils"
+)
+
+// AccessControlSubject abstracts an ACL subject of type `group:` or `user:`.
+type AccessControlSubject interface {
+	IsMatch(subject Subject) (match bool)
+}
+
+// AccessControlSubjects represents an ACL subject.
+type AccessControlSubjects struct {
+	Subjects []AccessControlSubject
+}
+
+// AddSubject appends to the AccessControlSubjects based on a subject rule string.
+func (acs *AccessControlSubjects) AddSubject(subjectRule string) {
+	subject := schemaSubjectToACLSubject(subjectRule)
+
+	if subject != nil {
+		acs.Subjects = append(acs.Subjects, subject)
+	}
+}
+
+// IsMatch returns true if the ACL subjects match the subject properties.
+func (acs AccessControlSubjects) IsMatch(subject Subject) (match bool) {
+	for _, rule := range acs.Subjects {
+		if !rule.IsMatch(subject) {
+			return false
+		}
+	}
+
+	return true
+}
+
+// AccessControlUser represents an ACL subject of type `user:`.
+type AccessControlUser struct {
+	Name string
+}
+
+// IsMatch returns true if the AccessControlUser name matches the Subject username.
+func (acu AccessControlUser) IsMatch(subject Subject) (match bool) {
+	return subject.Username == acu.Name
+}
+
+// AccessControlGroup represents an ACL subject of type `group:`.
+type AccessControlGroup struct {
+	Name string
+}
+
+// IsMatch returns true if the AccessControlGroup name matches one of the groups of the Subject.
+func (acg AccessControlGroup) IsMatch(subject Subject) (match bool) {
+	return utils.IsStringInSlice(acg.Name, subject.Groups)
+}

internal/authorization/authorizer.go

@@ -1,110 +1,32 @@
 package authorization
 
 import (
-	"fmt"
-	"net"
-	"net/url"
-	"strings"
-
 	"github.com/authelia/authelia/internal/configuration/schema"
 	"github.com/authelia/authelia/internal/logging"
 )
 
-const userPrefix = "user:"
-const groupPrefix = "group:"
-
 // Authorizer the component in charge of checking whether a user can access a given resource.
 type Authorizer struct {
-	configuration schema.AccessControlConfiguration
+	defaultPolicy Level
+	rules         []*AccessControlRule
 }
 
 // NewAuthorizer create an instance of authorizer with a given access control configuration.
 func NewAuthorizer(configuration schema.AccessControlConfiguration) *Authorizer {
 	return &Authorizer{
-		configuration: configuration,
+		defaultPolicy: PolicyToLevel(configuration.DefaultPolicy),
+		rules:         NewAccessControlRules(configuration),
 	}
 }
 
-// Subject subject who to check access control for.
-type Subject struct {
-	Username string
-	Groups   []string
-	IP       net.IP
-}
-
-func (s Subject) String() string {
-	return fmt.Sprintf("username=%s groups=%s ip=%s", s.Username, strings.Join(s.Groups, ","), s.IP.String())
-}
-
-// Object object to check access control for.
-type Object struct {
-	Domain string
-	Path   string
-}
-
-// selectMatchingSubjectRules take a set of rules and select only the rules matching the subject constraints.
-func selectMatchingSubjectRules(rules []schema.ACLRule, networks []schema.ACLNetwork, subject Subject) []schema.ACLRule {
-	selectedRules := []schema.ACLRule{}
-
-	for _, rule := range rules {
-		switch {
-		case len(rule.Subjects) > 0:
-			for _, subjectRule := range rule.Subjects {
-				if isSubjectMatching(subject, subjectRule) && isIPMatching(subject.IP, rule.Networks, networks) {
-					selectedRules = append(selectedRules, rule)
-				}
-			}
-		default:
-			if isIPMatching(subject.IP, rule.Networks, networks) {
-				selectedRules = append(selectedRules, rule)
-			}
-		}
-	}
-
-	return selectedRules
-}
-
-func selectMatchingObjectRules(rules []schema.ACLRule, object Object) []schema.ACLRule {
-	selectedRules := []schema.ACLRule{}
-
-	for _, rule := range rules {
-		if isDomainMatching(object.Domain, rule.Domains) && isPathMatching(object.Path, rule.Resources) {
-			selectedRules = append(selectedRules, rule)
-		}
-	}
-
-	return selectedRules
-}
-
-func selectMatchingRules(rules []schema.ACLRule, networks []schema.ACLNetwork, subject Subject, object Object) []schema.ACLRule {
-	matchingRules := selectMatchingSubjectRules(rules, networks, subject)
-	return selectMatchingObjectRules(matchingRules, object)
-}
-
-// PolicyToLevel converts a string policy to int authorization level.
-func PolicyToLevel(policy string) Level {
-	switch policy {
-	case "bypass":
-		return Bypass
-	case "one_factor":
-		return OneFactor
-	case "two_factor":
-		return TwoFactor
-	case "deny":
-		return Denied
-	}
-	// By default the deny policy applies.
-	return Denied
-}
-
 // IsSecondFactorEnabled return true if at least one policy is set to second factor.
 func (p *Authorizer) IsSecondFactorEnabled() bool {
-	if PolicyToLevel(p.configuration.DefaultPolicy) == TwoFactor {
+	if p.defaultPolicy == TwoFactor {
 		return true
 	}
 
-	for _, r := range p.configuration.Rules {
+	for _, rule := range p.rules {
-		if PolicyToLevel(r.Policy) == TwoFactor {
+		if rule.Policy == TwoFactor {
 			return true
 		}
 	}
@@ -113,20 +35,17 @@ func (p *Authorizer) IsSecondFactorEnabled() bool {
 }
 
 // GetRequiredLevel retrieve the required level of authorization to access the object.
-func (p *Authorizer) GetRequiredLevel(subject Subject, requestURL url.URL) Level {
+func (p *Authorizer) GetRequiredLevel(subject Subject, object Object) Level {
 	logger := logging.Logger()
-	logger.Tracef("Check authorization of subject %s and url %s.", subject.String(), requestURL.String())
+	logger.Tracef("Check authorization of subject %s and url %s.", subject.String(), object.String())
 
-	matchingRules := selectMatchingRules(p.configuration.Rules, p.configuration.Networks, subject, Object{
+	for _, rule := range p.rules {
-		Domain: requestURL.Hostname(),
+		if rule.IsMatch(subject, object) {
-		Path:   requestURL.Path,
+			return rule.Policy
-	})
+		}
-
-	if len(matchingRules) > 0 {
-		return PolicyToLevel(matchingRules[0].Policy)
 	}
 
-	logger.Tracef("No matching rule for subject %s and url %s... Applying default policy.", subject.String(), requestURL.String())
+	logger.Tracef("No matching rule for subject %s and url %s... Applying default policy.", subject.String(), object.String())
 
-	return PolicyToLevel(p.configuration.DefaultPolicy)
+	return p.defaultPolicy
 }

internal/authorization/authorizer_test.go

@@ -25,13 +25,17 @@ func NewAuthorizerTester(config schema.AccessControlConfiguration) *AuthorizerTe
 	}
 }
 
-func (s *AuthorizerTester) CheckAuthorizations(t *testing.T, subject Subject, requestURI string, expectedLevel Level) {
+func (s *AuthorizerTester) CheckAuthorizations(t *testing.T, subject Subject, requestURI, method string, expectedLevel Level) {
 	url, _ := url.ParseRequestURI(requestURI)
-	level := s.GetRequiredLevel(Subject{
+
-		Groups:   subject.Groups,
+	object := Object{
-		Username: subject.Username,
+		Scheme: url.Scheme,
-		IP:       subject.IP,
+		Domain: url.Hostname(),
-	}, *url)
+		Path:   url.Path,
+		Method: method,
+	}
+
+	level := s.GetRequiredLevel(subject, object)
 
 	assert.Equal(t, expectedLevel, level)
 }
@@ -80,24 +84,40 @@ var UserWithoutGroups = Subject{
 
 var Bob = UserWithoutGroups
 
+var UserWithIPv6Address = Subject{
+	Username: "sam",
+	Groups:   []string{},
+	IP:       net.ParseIP("fec0::1"),
+}
+
+var Sam = UserWithIPv6Address
+
+var UserWithIPv6AddressAndGroups = Subject{
+	Username: "sam",
+	Groups:   []string{"dev", "admins"},
+	IP:       net.ParseIP("fec0::2"),
+}
+
+var Sally = UserWithIPv6AddressAndGroups
+
 func (s *AuthorizerSuite) TestShouldCheckDefaultBypassConfig() {
 	tester := NewAuthorizerBuilder().
 		WithDefaultPolicy("bypass").Build()
 
-	tester.CheckAuthorizations(s.T(), AnonymousUser, "https://public.example.com/", Bypass)
+	tester.CheckAuthorizations(s.T(), AnonymousUser, "https://public.example.com/", "GET", Bypass)
-	tester.CheckAuthorizations(s.T(), UserWithGroups, "https://public.example.com/", Bypass)
+	tester.CheckAuthorizations(s.T(), UserWithGroups, "https://public.example.com/", "GET", Bypass)
-	tester.CheckAuthorizations(s.T(), UserWithoutGroups, "https://public.example.com/", Bypass)
+	tester.CheckAuthorizations(s.T(), UserWithoutGroups, "https://public.example.com/", "GET", Bypass)
-	tester.CheckAuthorizations(s.T(), UserWithoutGroups, "https://public.example.com/elsewhere", Bypass)
+	tester.CheckAuthorizations(s.T(), UserWithoutGroups, "https://public.example.com/elsewhere", "GET", Bypass)
 }
 
 func (s *AuthorizerSuite) TestShouldCheckDefaultDeniedConfig() {
 	tester := NewAuthorizerBuilder().
 		WithDefaultPolicy("deny").Build()
 
-	tester.CheckAuthorizations(s.T(), AnonymousUser, "https://public.example.com/", Denied)
+	tester.CheckAuthorizations(s.T(), AnonymousUser, "https://public.example.com/", "GET", Denied)
-	tester.CheckAuthorizations(s.T(), UserWithGroups, "https://public.example.com/", Denied)
+	tester.CheckAuthorizations(s.T(), UserWithGroups, "https://public.example.com/", "GET", Denied)
-	tester.CheckAuthorizations(s.T(), UserWithoutGroups, "https://public.example.com/", Denied)
+	tester.CheckAuthorizations(s.T(), UserWithoutGroups, "https://public.example.com/", "GET", Denied)
-	tester.CheckAuthorizations(s.T(), UserWithoutGroups, "https://public.example.com/elsewhere", Denied)
+	tester.CheckAuthorizations(s.T(), UserWithoutGroups, "https://public.example.com/elsewhere", "GET", Denied)
 }
 
 func (s *AuthorizerSuite) TestShouldCheckMultiDomainRule() {
@@ -109,12 +129,31 @@ func (s *AuthorizerSuite) TestShouldCheckMultiDomainRule() {
 		}).
 		Build()
 
-	tester.CheckAuthorizations(s.T(), UserWithGroups, "https://public.example.com/", Bypass)
+	tester.CheckAuthorizations(s.T(), UserWithGroups, "https://public.example.com/", "GET", Bypass)
-	tester.CheckAuthorizations(s.T(), UserWithGroups, "https://private.example.com/", Bypass)
+	tester.CheckAuthorizations(s.T(), UserWithGroups, "https://private.example.com/", "GET", Bypass)
-	tester.CheckAuthorizations(s.T(), UserWithGroups, "https://public.example.com/elsewhere", Bypass)
+	tester.CheckAuthorizations(s.T(), UserWithGroups, "https://public.example.com/elsewhere", "GET", Bypass)
-	tester.CheckAuthorizations(s.T(), UserWithGroups, "https://example.com/", Denied)
+	tester.CheckAuthorizations(s.T(), UserWithGroups, "https://example.com/", "GET", Denied)
-	tester.CheckAuthorizations(s.T(), UserWithGroups, "https://public.example.com.c/", Denied)
+	tester.CheckAuthorizations(s.T(), UserWithGroups, "https://public.example.com.c/", "GET", Denied)
-	tester.CheckAuthorizations(s.T(), UserWithGroups, "https://public.example.co/", Denied)
+	tester.CheckAuthorizations(s.T(), UserWithGroups, "https://public.example.co/", "GET", Denied)
+}
+
+func (s *AuthorizerSuite) TestShouldCheckDynamicDomainRules() {
+	tester := NewAuthorizerBuilder().
+		WithDefaultPolicy("deny").
+		WithRule(schema.ACLRule{
+			Domains: []string{"{user}.example.com"},
+			Policy:  "bypass",
+		}).
+		WithRule(schema.ACLRule{
+			Domains: []string{"{group}.example.com"},
+			Policy:  "bypass",
+		}).
+		Build()
+
+	tester.CheckAuthorizations(s.T(), UserWithGroups, "https://john.example.com/", "GET", Bypass)
+	tester.CheckAuthorizations(s.T(), UserWithGroups, "https://dev.example.com/", "GET", Bypass)
+	tester.CheckAuthorizations(s.T(), UserWithGroups, "https://admins.example.com/", "GET", Bypass)
+	tester.CheckAuthorizations(s.T(), UserWithGroups, "https://othergroup.example.com/", "GET", Denied)
 }
 
 func (s *AuthorizerSuite) TestShouldCheckMultipleDomainRule() {
@@ -126,15 +165,15 @@ func (s *AuthorizerSuite) TestShouldCheckMultipleDomainRule() {
 		}).
 		Build()
 
-	tester.CheckAuthorizations(s.T(), UserWithGroups, "https://public.example.com/", Bypass)
+	tester.CheckAuthorizations(s.T(), UserWithGroups, "https://public.example.com/", "GET", Bypass)
-	tester.CheckAuthorizations(s.T(), UserWithGroups, "https://private.example.com/", Bypass)
+	tester.CheckAuthorizations(s.T(), UserWithGroups, "https://private.example.com/", "GET", Bypass)
-	tester.CheckAuthorizations(s.T(), UserWithGroups, "https://public.example.com/elsewhere", Bypass)
+	tester.CheckAuthorizations(s.T(), UserWithGroups, "https://public.example.com/elsewhere", "GET", Bypass)
-	tester.CheckAuthorizations(s.T(), UserWithGroups, "https://example.com/", Denied)
+	tester.CheckAuthorizations(s.T(), UserWithGroups, "https://example.com/", "GET", Denied)
-	tester.CheckAuthorizations(s.T(), UserWithGroups, "https://public.example.com.c/", Denied)
+	tester.CheckAuthorizations(s.T(), UserWithGroups, "https://public.example.com.c/", "GET", Denied)
-	tester.CheckAuthorizations(s.T(), UserWithGroups, "https://public.example.co/", Denied)
+	tester.CheckAuthorizations(s.T(), UserWithGroups, "https://public.example.co/", "GET", Denied)
-	tester.CheckAuthorizations(s.T(), UserWithGroups, "https://other.com/", Bypass)
+	tester.CheckAuthorizations(s.T(), UserWithGroups, "https://other.com/", "GET", Bypass)
-	tester.CheckAuthorizations(s.T(), UserWithGroups, "https://other.com/elsewhere", Bypass)
+	tester.CheckAuthorizations(s.T(), UserWithGroups, "https://other.com/elsewhere", "GET", Bypass)
-	tester.CheckAuthorizations(s.T(), UserWithGroups, "https://private.other.com/", Denied)
+	tester.CheckAuthorizations(s.T(), UserWithGroups, "https://private.other.com/", "GET", Denied)
 }
 
 func (s *AuthorizerSuite) TestShouldCheckFactorsPolicy() {
@@ -154,10 +193,10 @@ func (s *AuthorizerSuite) TestShouldCheckFactorsPolicy() {
 		}).
 		Build()
 
-	tester.CheckAuthorizations(s.T(), UserWithGroups, "https://public.example.com/", Bypass)
+	tester.CheckAuthorizations(s.T(), UserWithGroups, "https://public.example.com/", "GET", Bypass)
-	tester.CheckAuthorizations(s.T(), UserWithGroups, "https://protected.example.com/", TwoFactor)
+	tester.CheckAuthorizations(s.T(), UserWithGroups, "https://protected.example.com/", "GET", TwoFactor)
-	tester.CheckAuthorizations(s.T(), UserWithGroups, "https://single.example.com/", OneFactor)
+	tester.CheckAuthorizations(s.T(), UserWithGroups, "https://single.example.com/", "GET", OneFactor)
-	tester.CheckAuthorizations(s.T(), UserWithGroups, "https://example.com/", Denied)
+	tester.CheckAuthorizations(s.T(), UserWithGroups, "https://example.com/", "GET", Denied)
 }
 
 func (s *AuthorizerSuite) TestShouldCheckRulePrecedence() {
@@ -178,9 +217,9 @@ func (s *AuthorizerSuite) TestShouldCheckRulePrecedence() {
 		}).
 		Build()
 
-	tester.CheckAuthorizations(s.T(), John, "https://protected.example.com/", Bypass)
+	tester.CheckAuthorizations(s.T(), John, "https://protected.example.com/", "GET", Bypass)
-	tester.CheckAuthorizations(s.T(), Bob, "https://protected.example.com/", OneFactor)
+	tester.CheckAuthorizations(s.T(), Bob, "https://protected.example.com/", "GET", OneFactor)
-	tester.CheckAuthorizations(s.T(), John, "https://public.example.com/", TwoFactor)
+	tester.CheckAuthorizations(s.T(), John, "https://public.example.com/", "GET", TwoFactor)
 }
 
 func (s *AuthorizerSuite) TestShouldCheckUserMatching() {
@@ -188,13 +227,13 @@ func (s *AuthorizerSuite) TestShouldCheckUserMatching() {
 		WithDefaultPolicy("deny").
 		WithRule(schema.ACLRule{
 			Domains:  []string{"protected.example.com"},
-			Policy:   "bypass",
+			Policy:   "one_factor",
 			Subjects: [][]string{{"user:john"}},
 		}).
 		Build()
 
-	tester.CheckAuthorizations(s.T(), John, "https://protected.example.com/", Bypass)
+	tester.CheckAuthorizations(s.T(), John, "https://protected.example.com/", "GET", OneFactor)
-	tester.CheckAuthorizations(s.T(), Bob, "https://protected.example.com/", Denied)
+	tester.CheckAuthorizations(s.T(), Bob, "https://protected.example.com/", "GET", Denied)
 }
 
 func (s *AuthorizerSuite) TestShouldCheckGroupMatching() {
@@ -202,13 +241,13 @@ func (s *AuthorizerSuite) TestShouldCheckGroupMatching() {
 		WithDefaultPolicy("deny").
 		WithRule(schema.ACLRule{
 			Domains:  []string{"protected.example.com"},
-			Policy:   "bypass",
+			Policy:   "one_factor",
 			Subjects: [][]string{{"group:admins"}},
 		}).
 		Build()
 
-	tester.CheckAuthorizations(s.T(), John, "https://protected.example.com/", Bypass)
+	tester.CheckAuthorizations(s.T(), John, "https://protected.example.com/", "GET", OneFactor)
-	tester.CheckAuthorizations(s.T(), Bob, "https://protected.example.com/", Denied)
+	tester.CheckAuthorizations(s.T(), Bob, "https://protected.example.com/", "GET", Denied)
 }
 
 func (s *AuthorizerSuite) TestShouldCheckSubjectsMatching() {
@@ -216,14 +255,15 @@ func (s *AuthorizerSuite) TestShouldCheckSubjectsMatching() {
 		WithDefaultPolicy("deny").
 		WithRule(schema.ACLRule{
 			Domains:  []string{"protected.example.com"},
-			Policy:   "bypass",
+			Policy:   "one_factor",
 			Subjects: [][]string{{"group:admins"}, {"user:bob"}},
 		}).
 		Build()
 
-	tester.CheckAuthorizations(s.T(), John, "https://protected.example.com/", Bypass)
+	tester.CheckAuthorizations(s.T(), John, "https://protected.example.com/", "GET", OneFactor)
-	tester.CheckAuthorizations(s.T(), Bob, "https://protected.example.com/", Bypass)
+	tester.CheckAuthorizations(s.T(), Bob, "https://protected.example.com/", "GET", OneFactor)
-	tester.CheckAuthorizations(s.T(), AnonymousUser, "https://protected.example.com/", Denied)
+	tester.CheckAuthorizations(s.T(), Sam, "https://protected.example.com/", "GET", Denied)
+	tester.CheckAuthorizations(s.T(), AnonymousUser, "https://protected.example.com/", "GET", OneFactor)
 }
 
 func (s *AuthorizerSuite) TestShouldCheckMultipleSubjectsMatching() {
@@ -231,14 +271,14 @@ func (s *AuthorizerSuite) TestShouldCheckMultipleSubjectsMatching() {
 		WithDefaultPolicy("deny").
 		WithRule(schema.ACLRule{
 			Domains:  []string{"protected.example.com"},
-			Policy:   "bypass",
+			Policy:   "one_factor",
 			Subjects: [][]string{{"group:admins", "user:bob"}, {"group:admins", "group:dev"}},
 		}).
 		Build()
 
-	tester.CheckAuthorizations(s.T(), John, "https://protected.example.com/", Bypass)
+	tester.CheckAuthorizations(s.T(), John, "https://protected.example.com/", "GET", OneFactor)
-	tester.CheckAuthorizations(s.T(), Bob, "https://protected.example.com/", Denied)
+	tester.CheckAuthorizations(s.T(), Bob, "https://protected.example.com/", "GET", Denied)
-	tester.CheckAuthorizations(s.T(), AnonymousUser, "https://protected.example.com/", Denied)
+	tester.CheckAuthorizations(s.T(), AnonymousUser, "https://protected.example.com/", "GET", OneFactor)
 }
 
 func (s *AuthorizerSuite) TestShouldCheckIPMatching() {
@@ -259,15 +299,63 @@ func (s *AuthorizerSuite) TestShouldCheckIPMatching() {
 			Policy:   "two_factor",
 			Networks: []string{"10.0.0.0/8"},
 		}).
+		WithRule(schema.ACLRule{
+			Domains:  []string{"ipv6.example.com"},
+			Policy:   "two_factor",
+			Networks: []string{"fec0::1/64"},
+		}).
+		WithRule(schema.ACLRule{
+			Domains:  []string{"ipv6-alt.example.com"},
+			Policy:   "two_factor",
+			Networks: []string{"fec0::1"},
+		}).
 		Build()
 
-	tester.CheckAuthorizations(s.T(), John, "https://protected.example.com/", Bypass)
+	tester.CheckAuthorizations(s.T(), John, "https://protected.example.com/", "GET", Bypass)
-	tester.CheckAuthorizations(s.T(), Bob, "https://protected.example.com/", OneFactor)
+	tester.CheckAuthorizations(s.T(), Bob, "https://protected.example.com/", "GET", OneFactor)
-	tester.CheckAuthorizations(s.T(), AnonymousUser, "https://protected.example.com/", Denied)
+	tester.CheckAuthorizations(s.T(), AnonymousUser, "https://protected.example.com/", "GET", Denied)
 
-	tester.CheckAuthorizations(s.T(), John, "https://net.example.com/", TwoFactor)
+	tester.CheckAuthorizations(s.T(), John, "https://net.example.com/", "GET", TwoFactor)
-	tester.CheckAuthorizations(s.T(), Bob, "https://net.example.com/", TwoFactor)
+	tester.CheckAuthorizations(s.T(), Bob, "https://net.example.com/", "GET", TwoFactor)
-	tester.CheckAuthorizations(s.T(), AnonymousUser, "https://net.example.com/", Denied)
+	tester.CheckAuthorizations(s.T(), AnonymousUser, "https://net.example.com/", "GET", Denied)
+
+	tester.CheckAuthorizations(s.T(), Sally, "https://ipv6-alt.example.com/", "GET", Denied)
+	tester.CheckAuthorizations(s.T(), Sam, "https://ipv6-alt.example.com/", "GET", TwoFactor)
+	tester.CheckAuthorizations(s.T(), Sally, "https://ipv6.example.com/", "GET", TwoFactor)
+	tester.CheckAuthorizations(s.T(), Sam, "https://ipv6.example.com/", "GET", TwoFactor)
+}
+
+func (s *AuthorizerSuite) TestShouldCheckMethodMatching() {
+	tester := NewAuthorizerBuilder().
+		WithDefaultPolicy("deny").
+		WithRule(schema.ACLRule{
+			Domains: []string{"protected.example.com"},
+			Policy:  "bypass",
+			Methods: []string{"OPTIONS", "HEAD", "GET", "CONNECT", "TRACE"},
+		}).
+		WithRule(schema.ACLRule{
+			Domains: []string{"protected.example.com"},
+			Policy:  "one_factor",
+			Methods: []string{"PUT", "PATCH", "POST"},
+		}).
+		WithRule(schema.ACLRule{
+			Domains: []string{"protected.example.com"},
+			Policy:  "two_factor",
+			Methods: []string{"DELETE"},
+		}).
+		Build()
+
+	tester.CheckAuthorizations(s.T(), John, "https://protected.example.com/", "GET", Bypass)
+	tester.CheckAuthorizations(s.T(), Bob, "https://protected.example.com/", "OPTIONS", Bypass)
+	tester.CheckAuthorizations(s.T(), AnonymousUser, "https://protected.example.com/", "HEAD", Bypass)
+	tester.CheckAuthorizations(s.T(), John, "https://protected.example.com/", "CONNECT", Bypass)
+	tester.CheckAuthorizations(s.T(), Bob, "https://protected.example.com/", "TRACE", Bypass)
+
+	tester.CheckAuthorizations(s.T(), John, "https://protected.example.com/", "PUT", OneFactor)
+	tester.CheckAuthorizations(s.T(), Bob, "https://protected.example.com/", "PATCH", OneFactor)
+	tester.CheckAuthorizations(s.T(), AnonymousUser, "https://protected.example.com/", "POST", OneFactor)
+
+	tester.CheckAuthorizations(s.T(), AnonymousUser, "https://protected.example.com/", "DELETE", TwoFactor)
 }
 
 func (s *AuthorizerSuite) TestShouldCheckResourceMatching() {
@@ -285,12 +373,109 @@ func (s *AuthorizerSuite) TestShouldCheckResourceMatching() {
 		}).
 		Build()
 
-	tester.CheckAuthorizations(s.T(), John, "https://resource.example.com/", Bypass)
+	tester.CheckAuthorizations(s.T(), John, "https://resource.example.com/", "GET", Bypass)
-	tester.CheckAuthorizations(s.T(), John, "https://resource.example.com/bypass/abc", Bypass)
+	tester.CheckAuthorizations(s.T(), John, "https://resource.example.com/bypass/abc", "GET", Bypass)
-	tester.CheckAuthorizations(s.T(), John, "https://resource.example.com/bypass/", Denied)
+	tester.CheckAuthorizations(s.T(), John, "https://resource.example.com/bypass/", "GET", Denied)
-	tester.CheckAuthorizations(s.T(), John, "https://resource.example.com/bypass/ABC", Denied)
+	tester.CheckAuthorizations(s.T(), John, "https://resource.example.com/bypass/ABC", "GET", Denied)
-	tester.CheckAuthorizations(s.T(), John, "https://resource.example.com/one_factor/abc", OneFactor)
+	tester.CheckAuthorizations(s.T(), John, "https://resource.example.com/one_factor/abc", "GET", OneFactor)
-	tester.CheckAuthorizations(s.T(), John, "https://resource.example.com/xyz/embedded/abc", Bypass)
+	tester.CheckAuthorizations(s.T(), John, "https://resource.example.com/xyz/embedded/abc", "GET", Bypass)
+}
+
+// This test assures that rules without domains (not allowed by schema validator at this time) will pass validation correctly.
+func (s *AuthorizerSuite) TestShouldMatchAnyDomainIfBlank() {
+	tester := NewAuthorizerBuilder().
+		WithRule(schema.ACLRule{
+			Policy:  "bypass",
+			Methods: []string{"OPTIONS", "HEAD", "GET", "CONNECT", "TRACE"},
+		}).
+		WithRule(schema.ACLRule{
+			Policy:  "one_factor",
+			Methods: []string{"PUT", "PATCH"},
+		}).
+		WithRule(schema.ACLRule{
+			Policy:  "two_factor",
+			Methods: []string{"DELETE"},
+		}).
+		Build()
+
+	tester.CheckAuthorizations(s.T(), John, "https://one.domain-four.com", "GET", Bypass)
+	tester.CheckAuthorizations(s.T(), AnonymousUser, "https://one.domain-three.com", "GET", Bypass)
+	tester.CheckAuthorizations(s.T(), AnonymousUser, "https://one.domain-two.com", "OPTIONS", Bypass)
+
+	tester.CheckAuthorizations(s.T(), John, "https://one.domain-four.com", "PUT", OneFactor)
+	tester.CheckAuthorizations(s.T(), AnonymousUser, "https://one.domain-three.com", "PATCH", OneFactor)
+	tester.CheckAuthorizations(s.T(), AnonymousUser, "https://one.domain-two.com", "PUT", OneFactor)
+
+	tester.CheckAuthorizations(s.T(), John, "https://one.domain-four.com", "DELETE", TwoFactor)
+	tester.CheckAuthorizations(s.T(), AnonymousUser, "https://one.domain-three.com", "DELETE", TwoFactor)
+	tester.CheckAuthorizations(s.T(), AnonymousUser, "https://one.domain-two.com", "DELETE", TwoFactor)
+
+	tester.CheckAuthorizations(s.T(), John, "https://one.domain-four.com", "POST", Denied)
+	tester.CheckAuthorizations(s.T(), AnonymousUser, "https://one.domain-three.com", "POST", Denied)
+	tester.CheckAuthorizations(s.T(), AnonymousUser, "https://one.domain-two.com", "POST", Denied)
+}
+
+func (s *AuthorizerSuite) TestShouldMatchResourceWithSubjectRules() {
+	tester := NewAuthorizerBuilder().
+		WithDefaultPolicy("deny").
+		WithRule(schema.ACLRule{
+			Domains:   []string{"public.example.com"},
+			Resources: []string{"^/admin/.*$"},
+			Subjects:  [][]string{{"group:admins"}},
+			Policy:    "one_factor",
+		}).
+		WithRule(schema.ACLRule{
+			Domains:   []string{"public.example.com"},
+			Resources: []string{"^/admin/.*$"},
+			Policy:    "deny",
+		}).
+		WithRule(schema.ACLRule{
+			Domains: []string{"public.example.com"},
+			Policy:  "bypass",
+		}).
+		WithRule(schema.ACLRule{
+			Domains:   []string{"public2.example.com"},
+			Resources: []string{"^/admin/.*$"},
+			Subjects:  [][]string{{"group:admins"}},
+			Policy:    "bypass",
+		}).
+		WithRule(schema.ACLRule{
+			Domains:   []string{"public2.example.com"},
+			Resources: []string{"^/admin/.*$"},
+			Policy:    "deny",
+		}).
+		WithRule(schema.ACLRule{
+			Domains: []string{"public2.example.com"},
+			Policy:  "bypass",
+		}).
+		WithRule(schema.ACLRule{
+			Domains:  []string{"private.example.com"},
+			Subjects: [][]string{{"group:admins"}},
+			Policy:   "two_factor",
+		}).
+		Build()
+
+	tester.CheckAuthorizations(s.T(), John, "https://public.example.com", "GET", Bypass)
+	tester.CheckAuthorizations(s.T(), Bob, "https://public.example.com", "GET", Bypass)
+	tester.CheckAuthorizations(s.T(), AnonymousUser, "https://public.example.com", "GET", Bypass)
+
+	tester.CheckAuthorizations(s.T(), John, "https://public.example.com/admin/index.html", "GET", OneFactor)
+	tester.CheckAuthorizations(s.T(), Bob, "https://public.example.com/admin/index.html", "GET", Denied)
+	tester.CheckAuthorizations(s.T(), AnonymousUser, "https://public.example.com/admin/index.html", "GET", OneFactor)
+
+	tester.CheckAuthorizations(s.T(), John, "https://public2.example.com", "GET", Bypass)
+	tester.CheckAuthorizations(s.T(), Bob, "https://public2.example.com", "GET", Bypass)
+	tester.CheckAuthorizations(s.T(), AnonymousUser, "https://public2.example.com", "GET", Bypass)
+
+	tester.CheckAuthorizations(s.T(), John, "https://public2.example.com/admin/index.html", "GET", Bypass)
+	tester.CheckAuthorizations(s.T(), Bob, "https://public2.example.com/admin/index.html", "GET", Denied)
+
+	// This test returns this result since we validate the schema instead of validating it in code.
+	tester.CheckAuthorizations(s.T(), AnonymousUser, "https://public2.example.com/admin/index.html", "GET", Bypass)
+
+	tester.CheckAuthorizations(s.T(), John, "https://private.example.com", "GET", TwoFactor)
+	tester.CheckAuthorizations(s.T(), Bob, "https://private.example.com", "GET", Denied)
+	tester.CheckAuthorizations(s.T(), AnonymousUser, "https://private.example.com", "GET", TwoFactor)
 }
 
 func (s *AuthorizerSuite) TestPolicyToLevel() {

internal/authorization/const.go

@@ -13,3 +13,6 @@ const (
 	// Denied denied level.
 	Denied Level = iota
 )
+
+const userPrefix = "user:"
+const groupPrefix = "group:"

internal/authorization/domain_matcher.go

@@ -1,15 +0,0 @@
-package authorization
-
-import "strings"
-
-func isDomainMatching(domain string, domainRules []string) bool {
-	for _, domainRule := range domainRules {
-		if domain == domainRule {
-			return true
-		} else if strings.HasPrefix(domainRule, "*.") && strings.HasSuffix(domain, domainRule[1:]) {
-			return true
-		}
-	}
-
-	return false
-}

internal/authorization/domain_matcher_test.go

@@ -1,36 +0,0 @@
-package authorization
-
-import (
-	"testing"
-
-	"github.com/stretchr/testify/assert"
-)
-
-func TestShouldMatchACLWithSingleDomain(t *testing.T) {
-	assert.True(t, isDomainMatching("example.com", []string{"example.com"}))
-
-	assert.True(t, isDomainMatching("abc.example.com", []string{"*.example.com"}))
-	assert.True(t, isDomainMatching("abc.def.example.com", []string{"*.example.com"}))
-}
-
-func TestShouldNotMatchACLWithSingleDomain(t *testing.T) {
-	assert.False(t, isDomainMatching("example.com", []string{"*.example.com"}))
-	// Character * must be followed by . to be valid.
-	assert.False(t, isDomainMatching("example.com", []string{"*example.com"}))
-
-	assert.False(t, isDomainMatching("example.com", []string{"*.exampl.com"}))
-
-	assert.False(t, isDomainMatching("example.com", []string{"*.other.net"}))
-	assert.False(t, isDomainMatching("example.com", []string{"*other.net"}))
-	assert.False(t, isDomainMatching("example.com", []string{"other.net"}))
-}
-
-func TestShouldMatchACLWithMultipleDomains(t *testing.T) {
-	assert.True(t, isDomainMatching("example.com", []string{"*.example.com", "example.com"}))
-	assert.True(t, isDomainMatching("apple.example.com", []string{"*.example.com", "example.com"}))
-}
-
-func TestShouldNotMatchACLWithMultipleDomains(t *testing.T) {
-	assert.False(t, isDomainMatching("example.com", []string{"*.example.com", "*example.com"}))
-	assert.False(t, isDomainMatching("apple.example.com", []string{"*example.com", "example.com"}))
-}

internal/authorization/ip_matcher.go

@@ -1,66 +0,0 @@
-package authorization
-
-import (
-	"net"
-	"strings"
-
-	"github.com/authelia/authelia/internal/configuration/schema"
-)
-
-func selectMatchingNetworkGroups(networks []string, aclNetworks []schema.ACLNetwork) []schema.ACLNetwork {
-	selectedNetworkGroups := []schema.ACLNetwork{}
-
-	for _, network := range networks {
-		for _, n := range aclNetworks {
-			for _, ng := range n.Name {
-				if network == ng {
-					selectedNetworkGroups = append(selectedNetworkGroups, n)
-				}
-			}
-		}
-	}
-
-	return selectedNetworkGroups
-}
-
-func isIPAddressOrCIDR(ip net.IP, network string) bool {
-	switch {
-	case ip.String() == network:
-		return true
-	case strings.Contains(network, "/"):
-		return parseCIDR(ip, network)
-	}
-
-	return false
-}
-
-func parseCIDR(ip net.IP, network string) bool {
-	_, ipNet, _ := net.ParseCIDR(network)
-	return ipNet.Contains(ip)
-}
-
-// isIPMatching check whether user's IP is in one of the network ranges.
-func isIPMatching(ip net.IP, networks []string, aclNetworks []schema.ACLNetwork) bool {
-	// If no network is provided in the rule, we match any network
-	if len(networks) == 0 {
-		return true
-	}
-
-	matchingNetworkGroups := selectMatchingNetworkGroups(networks, aclNetworks)
-
-	for _, network := range networks {
-		if net.ParseIP(network) == nil && !strings.Contains(network, "/") {
-			for _, n := range matchingNetworkGroups {
-				for _, network := range n.Networks {
-					if isIPAddressOrCIDR(ip, network) {
-						return true
-					}
-				}
-			}
-		} else if isIPAddressOrCIDR(ip, network) {
-			return true
-		}
-	}
-
-	return false
-}

internal/authorization/ip_matcher_test.go

@@ -1,38 +0,0 @@
-package authorization
-
-import (
-	"net"
-	"testing"
-
-	"github.com/stretchr/testify/assert"
-
-	"github.com/authelia/authelia/internal/configuration/schema"
-)
-
-func TestIPMatcher(t *testing.T) {
-	// Default policy is 'allow all ips' if no IP is defined
-	assert.True(t, isIPMatching(net.ParseIP("127.0.0.1"), []string{}, schema.DefaultACLNetwork))
-
-	assert.True(t, isIPMatching(net.ParseIP("127.0.0.1"), []string{"127.0.0.1"}, schema.DefaultACLNetwork))
-	assert.False(t, isIPMatching(net.ParseIP("127.1"), []string{"127.0.0.1"}, schema.DefaultACLNetwork))
-	assert.False(t, isIPMatching(net.ParseIP("not-an-ip"), []string{"127.0.0.1"}, schema.DefaultACLNetwork))
-
-	assert.False(t, isIPMatching(net.ParseIP("127.0.0.1"), []string{"10.0.0.1"}, schema.DefaultACLNetwork))
-	assert.False(t, isIPMatching(net.ParseIP("127.0.0.1"), []string{"10.0.0.0/8"}, schema.DefaultACLNetwork))
-
-	assert.True(t, isIPMatching(net.ParseIP("10.230.5.1"), []string{"10.0.0.0/8"}, schema.DefaultACLNetwork))
-	assert.True(t, isIPMatching(net.ParseIP("10.230.5.1"), []string{"192.168.0.0/24", "10.0.0.0/8"}, schema.DefaultACLNetwork))
-
-	// Test network groups
-	assert.True(t, isIPMatching(net.ParseIP("127.0.0.1"), []string{}, schema.DefaultACLNetwork))
-
-	assert.True(t, isIPMatching(net.ParseIP("127.0.0.1"), []string{"localhost"}, schema.DefaultACLNetwork))
-	assert.False(t, isIPMatching(net.ParseIP("127.1"), []string{"localhost"}, schema.DefaultACLNetwork))
-	assert.False(t, isIPMatching(net.ParseIP("not-an-ip"), []string{"localhost"}, schema.DefaultACLNetwork))
-
-	assert.False(t, isIPMatching(net.ParseIP("127.0.0.1"), []string{"internal"}, schema.DefaultACLNetwork))
-	assert.False(t, isIPMatching(net.ParseIP("127.0.0.1"), []string{"internal"}, schema.DefaultACLNetwork))
-
-	assert.True(t, isIPMatching(net.ParseIP("10.230.5.1"), []string{"internal"}, schema.DefaultACLNetwork))
-	assert.True(t, isIPMatching(net.ParseIP("10.230.5.1"), []string{"192.168.0.0/24", "internal"}, schema.DefaultACLNetwork))
-}

internal/authorization/path_matcher.go

@@ -1,19 +0,0 @@
-package authorization
-
-import "regexp"
-
-func isPathMatching(path string, pathRegexps []string) bool {
-	// If there is no regexp patterns, it means that we match any path.
-	if len(pathRegexps) == 0 {
-		return true
-	}
-
-	for _, pathRegexp := range pathRegexps {
-		match, _ := regexp.MatchString(pathRegexp, path)
-		if match {
-			return true
-		}
-	}
-
-	return false
-}

internal/authorization/path_matcher_test.go

@@ -1,24 +0,0 @@
-package authorization
-
-import (
-	"testing"
-
-	"github.com/stretchr/testify/assert"
-)
-
-func TestPathMatcher(t *testing.T) {
-	// Matching any path if no regexp is provided
-	assert.True(t, isPathMatching("/", []string{}))
-
-	assert.False(t, isPathMatching("/", []string{"^/api"}))
-	assert.True(t, isPathMatching("/api/test", []string{"^/api"}))
-	assert.False(t, isPathMatching("/api/test", []string{"^/api$"}))
-	assert.True(t, isPathMatching("/api", []string{"^/api$"}))
-	assert.True(t, isPathMatching("/api/test", []string{"^/api/?.*"}))
-	assert.True(t, isPathMatching("/apitest", []string{"^/api/?.*"}))
-	assert.True(t, isPathMatching("/api/test", []string{"^/api/.*"}))
-	assert.True(t, isPathMatching("/api/", []string{"^/api/.*"}))
-	assert.False(t, isPathMatching("/api", []string{"^/api/.*"}))
-
-	assert.False(t, isPathMatching("/api", []string{"xyz", "^/api/.*"}))
-}

internal/authorization/subject_matcher.go

@@ -1,29 +0,0 @@
-package authorization
-
-import (
-	"strings"
-
-	"github.com/authelia/authelia/internal/utils"
-)
-
-func isSubjectMatching(subject Subject, subjectRule []string) bool {
-	for _, ruleSubject := range subjectRule {
-		if strings.HasPrefix(ruleSubject, userPrefix) {
-			user := strings.Trim(ruleSubject[len(userPrefix):], " ")
-			if user == subject.Username {
-				continue
-			}
-		}
-
-		if strings.HasPrefix(ruleSubject, groupPrefix) {
-			group := strings.Trim(ruleSubject[len(groupPrefix):], " ")
-			if utils.IsStringInSlice(group, subject.Groups) {
-				continue
-			}
-		}
-
-		return false
-	}
-
-	return true
-}

internal/authorization/types.go

@@ -0,0 +1,60 @@
+package authorization
+
+import (
+	"fmt"
+	"net"
+	"net/url"
+	"strings"
+)
+
+// Subject represents the identity of a user for the purposes of ACL matching.
+type Subject struct {
+	Username string
+	Groups   []string
+	IP       net.IP
+}
+
+// String returns a string representation of the Subject.
+func (s Subject) String() string {
+	return fmt.Sprintf("username=%s groups=%s ip=%s", s.Username, strings.Join(s.Groups, ","), s.IP.String())
+}
+
+// IsAnonymous returns true if the Subject username and groups are empty.
+func (s Subject) IsAnonymous() bool {
+	return s.Username == "" && len(s.Groups) == 0
+}
+
+// Object represents a protected object for the purposes of ACL matching.
+type Object struct {
+	Scheme string
+	Domain string
+	Path   string
+	Method string
+}
+
+// String is a string representation of the Object.
+func (o Object) String() string {
+	return fmt.Sprintf("%s://%s%s", o.Scheme, o.Domain, o.Path)
+}
+
+// NewObjectRaw creates a new Object type from a URL and a method header.
+func NewObjectRaw(targetURL *url.URL, method []byte) (object Object) {
+	return NewObject(targetURL, string(method))
+}
+
+// NewObject creates a new Object type from a URL and a method header.
+func NewObject(targetURL *url.URL, method string) (object Object) {
+	object = Object{
+		Scheme: targetURL.Scheme,
+		Domain: targetURL.Hostname(),
+		Method: method,
+	}
+
+	if targetURL.RawQuery == "" {
+		object.Path = targetURL.Path
+	} else {
+		object.Path = targetURL.Path + "?" + targetURL.RawQuery
+	}
+
+	return object
+}

internal/authorization/types_test.go

@@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
+package authorization
+
+import (
+	"net/url"
+	"testing"
+
+	"github.com/stretchr/testify/assert"
+	"github.com/stretchr/testify/require"
+)
+
+func TestShouldAppendQueryParamToURL(t *testing.T) {
+	targetURL, err := url.Parse("https://domain.example.com/api?type=none")
+
+	require.NoError(t, err)
+
+	object := NewObject(targetURL, "GET")
+
+	assert.Equal(t, "domain.example.com", object.Domain)
+	assert.Equal(t, "GET", object.Method)
+	assert.Equal(t, "/api?type=none", object.Path)
+	assert.Equal(t, "https", object.Scheme)
+}

internal/authorization/util.go

@@ -0,0 +1,177 @@
+package authorization
+
+import (
+	"net"
+	"regexp"
+	"strings"
+
+	"github.com/authelia/authelia/internal/configuration/schema"
+)
+
+// PolicyToLevel converts a string policy to int authorization level.
+func PolicyToLevel(policy string) Level {
+	switch policy {
+	case "bypass":
+		return Bypass
+	case "one_factor":
+		return OneFactor
+	case "two_factor":
+		return TwoFactor
+	case "deny":
+		return Denied
+	}
+	// By default the deny policy applies.
+	return Denied
+}
+
+func schemaSubjectToACLSubject(subjectRule string) (subject AccessControlSubject) {
+	if strings.HasPrefix(subjectRule, userPrefix) {
+		user := strings.Trim(subjectRule[len(userPrefix):], " ")
+
+		return AccessControlUser{Name: user}
+	}
+
+	if strings.HasPrefix(subjectRule, groupPrefix) {
+		group := strings.Trim(subjectRule[len(groupPrefix):], " ")
+
+		return AccessControlGroup{Name: group}
+	}
+
+	return nil
+}
+
+func schemaDomainsToACL(domainRules []string) (domains []AccessControlDomain) {
+	for _, domainRule := range domainRules {
+		domain := AccessControlDomain{}
+
+		domainRule = strings.ToLower(domainRule)
+
+		switch {
+		case strings.HasPrefix(domainRule, "*."):
+			domain.Wildcard = true
+			domain.Name = domainRule[1:]
+		case strings.HasPrefix(domainRule, "{user}"):
+			domain.UserWildcard = true
+			domain.Name = domainRule[7:]
+		case strings.HasPrefix(domainRule, "{group}"):
+			domain.GroupWildcard = true
+			domain.Name = domainRule[8:]
+		default:
+			domain.Name = domainRule
+		}
+
+		domains = append(domains, domain)
+	}
+
+	return domains
+}
+
+func schemaResourcesToACL(resourceRules []string) (resources []AccessControlResource) {
+	for _, resourceRule := range resourceRules {
+		resources = append(resources, AccessControlResource{regexp.MustCompile(resourceRule)})
+	}
+
+	return resources
+}
+
+func schemaMethodsToACL(methodRules []string) (methods []string) {
+	for _, method := range methodRules {
+		methods = append(methods, strings.ToUpper(method))
+	}
+
+	return methods
+}
+
+func schemaNetworksToACL(networkRules []string, networksMap map[string][]*net.IPNet, networksCacheMap map[string]*net.IPNet) (networks []*net.IPNet) {
+	for _, network := range networkRules {
+		if _, ok := networksMap[network]; !ok {
+			if _, ok := networksCacheMap[network]; ok {
+				networks = append(networks, networksCacheMap[network])
+			} else {
+				cidr, err := parseNetwork(network)
+				if err == nil {
+					networks = append(networks, cidr)
+					networksCacheMap[cidr.String()] = cidr
+
+					if cidr.String() != network {
+						networksCacheMap[network] = cidr
+					}
+				}
+			}
+		} else {
+			networks = append(networks, networksMap[network]...)
+		}
+	}
+
+	return networks
+}
+
+func parseSchemaNetworks(schemaNetworks []schema.ACLNetwork) (networksMap map[string][]*net.IPNet, networksCacheMap map[string]*net.IPNet) {
+	// These maps store pointers to the net.IPNet values so we can reuse them efficiently.
+	// The networksMap contains the named networks as keys, the networksCacheMap contains the CIDR notations as keys.
+	networksMap = map[string][]*net.IPNet{}
+	networksCacheMap = map[string]*net.IPNet{}
+
+	for _, aclNetwork := range schemaNetworks {
+		var networks []*net.IPNet
+
+		for _, networkRule := range aclNetwork.Networks {
+			cidr, err := parseNetwork(networkRule)
+			if err == nil {
+				networks = append(networks, cidr)
+				networksCacheMap[cidr.String()] = cidr
+
+				if cidr.String() != networkRule {
+					networksCacheMap[networkRule] = cidr
+				}
+			}
+		}
+
+		if _, ok := networksMap[aclNetwork.Name]; len(networks) != 0 && !ok {
+			networksMap[aclNetwork.Name] = networks
+		}
+	}
+
+	return networksMap, networksCacheMap
+}
+
+func parseNetwork(networkRule string) (cidr *net.IPNet, err error) {
+	if !strings.Contains(networkRule, "/") {
+		ip := net.ParseIP(networkRule)
+		if ip.To4() != nil {
+			_, cidr, err = net.ParseCIDR(networkRule + "/32")
+		} else {
+			_, cidr, err = net.ParseCIDR(networkRule + "/128")
+		}
+	} else {
+		_, cidr, err = net.ParseCIDR(networkRule)
+	}
+
+	return cidr, err
+}
+
+func schemaSubjectsToACL(subjectRules [][]string) (subjects []AccessControlSubjects) {
+	for _, subjectRule := range subjectRules {
+		subject := AccessControlSubjects{}
+
+		for _, subjectRuleItem := range subjectRule {
+			subject.AddSubject(subjectRuleItem)
+		}
+
+		if len(subject.Subjects) != 0 {
+			subjects = append(subjects, subject)
+		}
+	}
+
+	return subjects
+}
+
+func domainToPrefixSuffix(domain string) (prefix, suffix string) {
+	parts := strings.Split(domain, ".")
+
+	if len(parts) == 1 {
+		return "", parts[0]
+	}
+
+	return parts[0], strings.Join(parts[1:], ".")
+}

internal/authorization/util_test.go

@@ -0,0 +1,184 @@
+package authorization
+
+import (
+	"net"
+	"testing"
+
+	"github.com/stretchr/testify/assert"
+	"github.com/stretchr/testify/require"
+
+	"github.com/authelia/authelia/internal/configuration/schema"
+)
+
+func TestShouldNotParseInvalidSubjects(t *testing.T) {
+	subjectsSchema := [][]string{{"groups:z"}, {"group:z", "users:b"}}
+	subjectsACL := schemaSubjectsToACL(subjectsSchema)
+
+	require.Len(t, subjectsACL, 1)
+
+	require.Len(t, subjectsACL[0].Subjects, 1)
+
+	assert.True(t, subjectsACL[0].IsMatch(Subject{Username: "a", Groups: []string{"z"}}))
+}
+
+func TestShouldSplitDomainCorrectly(t *testing.T) {
+	prefix, suffix := domainToPrefixSuffix("apple.example.com")
+
+	assert.Equal(t, "apple", prefix)
+	assert.Equal(t, "example.com", suffix)
+
+	prefix, suffix = domainToPrefixSuffix("example")
+
+	assert.Equal(t, "", prefix)
+	assert.Equal(t, "example", suffix)
+
+	prefix, suffix = domainToPrefixSuffix("example.com")
+
+	assert.Equal(t, "example", prefix)
+	assert.Equal(t, "com", suffix)
+}
+
+func TestShouldParseRuleNetworks(t *testing.T) {
+	schemaNetworks := []schema.ACLNetwork{
+		{
+			Name: "desktop",
+			Networks: []string{
+				"10.0.0.1",
+			},
+		},
+		{
+			Name: "lan",
+			Networks: []string{
+				"10.0.0.0/8",
+				"172.16.0.0/12",
+				"192.168.0.0/16",
+			},
+		},
+	}
+
+	_, firstNetwork, err := net.ParseCIDR("192.168.1.20/32")
+	require.NoError(t, err)
+
+	networksMap, networksCacheMap := parseSchemaNetworks(schemaNetworks)
+
+	assert.Len(t, networksCacheMap, 5)
+
+	networks := []string{"192.168.1.20", "lan"}
+
+	acl := schemaNetworksToACL(networks, networksMap, networksCacheMap)
+
+	assert.Len(t, networksCacheMap, 7)
+
+	require.Len(t, acl, 4)
+	assert.Equal(t, firstNetwork, acl[0])
+	assert.Equal(t, networksMap["lan"][0], acl[1])
+	assert.Equal(t, networksMap["lan"][1], acl[2])
+	assert.Equal(t, networksMap["lan"][2], acl[3])
+
+	// Check they are the same memory address.
+	assert.True(t, networksMap["lan"][0] == acl[1])
+	assert.True(t, networksMap["lan"][1] == acl[2])
+	assert.True(t, networksMap["lan"][2] == acl[3])
+
+	assert.False(t, firstNetwork == acl[0])
+}
+
+func TestShouldParseACLNetworks(t *testing.T) {
+	schemaNetworks := []schema.ACLNetwork{
+		{
+			Name: "test",
+			Networks: []string{
+				"10.0.0.1",
+			},
+		},
+		{
+			Name: "second",
+			Networks: []string{
+				"10.0.0.1",
+			},
+		},
+		{
+			Name: "duplicate",
+			Networks: []string{
+				"10.0.0.1",
+			},
+		},
+		{
+			Name: "duplicate",
+			Networks: []string{
+				"10.0.0.1",
+			},
+		},
+		{
+			Name: "ipv6",
+			Networks: []string{
+				"fec0::1",
+			},
+		},
+		{
+			Name: "ipv6net",
+			Networks: []string{
+				"fec0::1/64",
+			},
+		},
+		{
+			Name: "net",
+			Networks: []string{
+				"10.0.0.0/8",
+			},
+		},
+		{
+			Name: "badnet",
+			Networks: []string{
+				"bad/8",
+			},
+		},
+	}
+
+	_, firstNetwork, err := net.ParseCIDR("10.0.0.1/32")
+	require.NoError(t, err)
+
+	_, secondNetwork, err := net.ParseCIDR("10.0.0.0/8")
+	require.NoError(t, err)
+
+	_, thirdNetwork, err := net.ParseCIDR("fec0::1/64")
+	require.NoError(t, err)
+
+	_, fourthNetwork, err := net.ParseCIDR("fec0::1/128")
+	require.NoError(t, err)
+
+	networksMap, networksCacheMap := parseSchemaNetworks(schemaNetworks)
+
+	require.Len(t, networksMap, 6)
+	require.Contains(t, networksMap, "test")
+	require.Contains(t, networksMap, "second")
+	require.Contains(t, networksMap, "duplicate")
+	require.Contains(t, networksMap, "ipv6")
+	require.Contains(t, networksMap, "ipv6net")
+	require.Contains(t, networksMap, "net")
+	require.Len(t, networksMap["test"], 1)
+
+	require.Len(t, networksCacheMap, 7)
+	require.Contains(t, networksCacheMap, "10.0.0.1")
+	require.Contains(t, networksCacheMap, "10.0.0.1/32")
+	require.Contains(t, networksCacheMap, "10.0.0.1/32")
+	require.Contains(t, networksCacheMap, "10.0.0.0/8")
+	require.Contains(t, networksCacheMap, "fec0::1")
+	require.Contains(t, networksCacheMap, "fec0::1/128")
+	require.Contains(t, networksCacheMap, "fec0::1/64")
+
+	assert.Equal(t, firstNetwork, networksMap["test"][0])
+	assert.Equal(t, secondNetwork, networksMap["net"][0])
+	assert.Equal(t, thirdNetwork, networksMap["ipv6net"][0])
+	assert.Equal(t, fourthNetwork, networksMap["ipv6"][0])
+
+	assert.Equal(t, firstNetwork, networksCacheMap["10.0.0.1"])
+	assert.Equal(t, firstNetwork, networksCacheMap["10.0.0.1/32"])
+
+	assert.Equal(t, secondNetwork, networksCacheMap["10.0.0.0/8"])
+
+	assert.Equal(t, thirdNetwork, networksCacheMap["fec0::1/64"])
+
+	assert.Equal(t, fourthNetwork, networksCacheMap["fec0::1"])
+	assert.Equal(t, fourthNetwork, networksCacheMap["fec0::1/128"])
+}

internal/configuration/schema/access_control.go

@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ type AccessControlConfiguration struct {
 
 // ACLNetwork represents one ACL network group entry; "weak" coerces a single value into slice.
 type ACLNetwork struct {
-	Name     []string `mapstructure:"name,weak"`
+	Name     string   `mapstructure:"name"`
 	Networks []string `mapstructure:"networks"`
 }
 
@@ -20,16 +20,17 @@ type ACLRule struct {
 	Subjects  [][]string `mapstructure:"subject,weak"`
 	Networks  []string   `mapstructure:"networks"`
 	Resources []string   `mapstructure:"resources"`
+	Methods   []string   `mapstructure:"methods"`
 }
 
 // DefaultACLNetwork represents the default configuration related to access control network group configuration.
 var DefaultACLNetwork = []ACLNetwork{
 	{
-		Name:     []string{"localhost"},
+		Name:     "localhost",
 		Networks: []string{"127.0.0.1"},
 	},
 	{
-		Name:     []string{"internal"},
+		Name:     "internal",
 		Networks: []string{"10.0.0.0/8"},
 	},
 }

internal/configuration/validator/access_control.go

@@ -11,25 +11,25 @@ import (
 )
 
 // IsPolicyValid check if policy is valid.
-func IsPolicyValid(policy string) bool {
+func IsPolicyValid(policy string) (isValid bool) {
-	return policy == denyPolicy || policy == "one_factor" || policy == "two_factor" || policy == "bypass"
+	return policy == denyPolicy || policy == "one_factor" || policy == "two_factor" || policy == bypassPolicy
 }
 
 // IsResourceValid check if a resource is valid.
-func IsResourceValid(resource string) error {
+func IsResourceValid(resource string) (err error) {
-	_, err := regexp.Compile(resource)
+	_, err = regexp.Compile(resource)
 	return err
 }
 
 // IsSubjectValid check if a subject is valid.
-func IsSubjectValid(subject string) bool {
+func IsSubjectValid(subject string) (isValid bool) {
 	return subject == "" || strings.HasPrefix(subject, "user:") || strings.HasPrefix(subject, "group:")
 }
 
 // IsNetworkGroupValid check if a network group is valid.
 func IsNetworkGroupValid(configuration schema.AccessControlConfiguration, network string) bool {
 	for _, networks := range configuration.Networks {
-		if !utils.IsStringInSlice(network, networks.Name) {
+		if network != networks.Name {
 			continue
 		} else {
 			return true
@@ -40,7 +40,7 @@ func IsNetworkGroupValid(configuration schema.AccessControlConfiguration, networ
 }
 
 // IsNetworkValid check if a network is valid.
-func IsNetworkValid(network string) bool {
+func IsNetworkValid(network string) (isValid bool) {
 	if net.ParseIP(network) == nil {
 		_, _, err := net.ParseCIDR(network)
 		return err == nil
@@ -77,26 +77,52 @@ func ValidateRules(configuration schema.AccessControlConfiguration, validator *s
 			validator.Push(fmt.Errorf("Policy [%s] for domain: %s is invalid, a policy must either be 'deny', 'two_factor', 'one_factor' or 'bypass'", r.Policy, r.Domains))
 		}
 
-		for _, network := range r.Networks {
+		validateNetworks(r, configuration, validator)
-			if !IsNetworkValid(network) {
-				if !IsNetworkGroupValid(configuration, network) {
-					validator.Push(fmt.Errorf("Network %s for domain: %s is not a valid network or network group", r.Networks, r.Domains))
-				}
-			}
-		}
 
-		for _, resource := range r.Resources {
+		validateResources(r, validator)
-			if err := IsResourceValid(resource); err != nil {
-				validator.Push(fmt.Errorf("Resource %s for domain: %s is invalid, %s", r.Resources, r.Domains, err))
-			}
-		}
 
-		for _, subjectRule := range r.Subjects {
+		validateSubjects(r, validator)
-			for _, subject := range subjectRule {
+
-				if !IsSubjectValid(subject) {
+		validateMethods(r, validator)
-					validator.Push(fmt.Errorf("Subject %s for domain: %s must start with 'user:' or 'group:'", subjectRule, r.Domains))
+
-				}
+		if r.Policy == bypassPolicy && len(r.Subjects) != 0 {
+			validator.Push(fmt.Errorf(errAccessControlInvalidPolicyWithSubjects, r.Domains, r.Subjects))
+		}
+	}
+}
+
+func validateNetworks(r schema.ACLRule, configuration schema.AccessControlConfiguration, validator *schema.StructValidator) {
+	for _, network := range r.Networks {
+		if !IsNetworkValid(network) {
+			if !IsNetworkGroupValid(configuration, network) {
+				validator.Push(fmt.Errorf("Network %s for domain: %s is not a valid network or network group", r.Networks, r.Domains))
 			}
 		}
 	}
 }
+
+func validateResources(r schema.ACLRule, validator *schema.StructValidator) {
+	for _, resource := range r.Resources {
+		if err := IsResourceValid(resource); err != nil {
+			validator.Push(fmt.Errorf("Resource %s for domain: %s is invalid, %s", r.Resources, r.Domains, err))
+		}
+	}
+}
+
+func validateSubjects(r schema.ACLRule, validator *schema.StructValidator) {
+	for _, subjectRule := range r.Subjects {
+		for _, subject := range subjectRule {
+			if !IsSubjectValid(subject) {
+				validator.Push(fmt.Errorf("Subject %s for domain: %s is invalid, must start with 'user:' or 'group:'", subjectRule, r.Domains))
+			}
+		}
+	}
+}
+
+func validateMethods(r schema.ACLRule, validator *schema.StructValidator) {
+	for _, method := range r.Methods {
+		if !utils.IsStringInSliceFold(method, validRequestMethods) {
+			validator.Push(fmt.Errorf("Method %s for domain: %s is invalid, must be one of the following methods: %s", method, r.Domains, strings.Join(validRequestMethods, ", ")))
+		}
+	}
+}

internal/configuration/validator/access_control_test.go

@@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
 package validator
 
 import (
+	"fmt"
 	"testing"
 
 	"github.com/stretchr/testify/suite"
@@ -42,7 +43,7 @@ func (suite *AccessControl) TestShouldRaiseErrorInvalidDefaultPolicy() {
 func (suite *AccessControl) TestShouldRaiseErrorInvalidNetworkGroupNetwork() {
 	suite.configuration.Networks = []schema.ACLNetwork{
 		{
-			Name:     []string{"internal"},
+			Name:     "internal",
 			Networks: []string{"abc.def.ghi.jkl"},
 		},
 	}
@@ -52,7 +53,7 @@ func (suite *AccessControl) TestShouldRaiseErrorInvalidNetworkGroupNetwork() {
 	suite.Assert().False(suite.validator.HasWarnings())
 	suite.Require().Len(suite.validator.Errors(), 1)
 
-	suite.Assert().EqualError(suite.validator.Errors()[0], "Network [abc.def.ghi.jkl] from network group: [internal] must be a valid IP or CIDR")
+	suite.Assert().EqualError(suite.validator.Errors()[0], "Network [abc.def.ghi.jkl] from network group: internal must be a valid IP or CIDR")
 }
 
 func (suite *AccessControl) TestShouldRaiseErrorNoRulesDefined() {
@@ -100,6 +101,23 @@ func (suite *AccessControl) TestShouldRaiseErrorInvalidNetwork() {
 	suite.Assert().EqualError(suite.validator.Errors()[0], "Network [abc.def.ghi.jkl/32] for domain: [public.example.com] is not a valid network or network group")
 }
 
+func (suite *AccessControl) TestShouldRaiseErrorInvalidMethod() {
+	suite.configuration.Rules = []schema.ACLRule{
+		{
+			Domains: []string{"public.example.com"},
+			Policy:  "bypass",
+			Methods: []string{"GET", "HOP"},
+		},
+	}
+
+	ValidateRules(suite.configuration, suite.validator)
+
+	suite.Assert().False(suite.validator.HasWarnings())
+	suite.Require().Len(suite.validator.Errors(), 1)
+
+	suite.Assert().EqualError(suite.validator.Errors()[0], "Method HOP for domain: [public.example.com] is invalid, must be one of the following methods: GET, HEAD, POST, PUT, PATCH, DELETE, TRACE, CONNECT, OPTIONS")
+}
+
 func (suite *AccessControl) TestShouldRaiseErrorInvalidResource() {
 	suite.configuration.Rules = []schema.ACLRule{
 		{
@@ -118,20 +136,23 @@ func (suite *AccessControl) TestShouldRaiseErrorInvalidResource() {
 }
 
 func (suite *AccessControl) TestShouldRaiseErrorInvalidSubject() {
+	domains := []string{"public.example.com"}
+	subjects := [][]string{{"invalid"}}
 	suite.configuration.Rules = []schema.ACLRule{
 		{
-			Domains:  []string{"public.example.com"},
+			Domains:  domains,
 			Policy:   "bypass",
-			Subjects: [][]string{{"invalid"}},
+			Subjects: subjects,
 		},
 	}
 
 	ValidateRules(suite.configuration, suite.validator)
 
-	suite.Assert().False(suite.validator.HasWarnings())
+	suite.Require().Len(suite.validator.Warnings(), 0)
-	suite.Require().Len(suite.validator.Errors(), 1)
+	suite.Require().Len(suite.validator.Errors(), 2)
 
-	suite.Assert().EqualError(suite.validator.Errors()[0], "Subject [invalid] for domain: [public.example.com] must start with 'user:' or 'group:'")
+	suite.Assert().EqualError(suite.validator.Errors()[0], "Subject [invalid] for domain: [public.example.com] is invalid, must start with 'user:' or 'group:'")
+	suite.Assert().EqualError(suite.validator.Errors()[1], fmt.Sprintf(errAccessControlInvalidPolicyWithSubjects, domains, subjects))
 }
 
 func TestAccessControl(t *testing.T) {

internal/configuration/validator/authentication.go

@@ -195,10 +195,6 @@ func validateLdapAuthenticationBackend(configuration *schema.LDAPAuthenticationB
 	} else if !strings.HasPrefix(configuration.GroupsFilter, "(") || !strings.HasSuffix(configuration.GroupsFilter, ")") {
 		validator.Push(errors.New("The groups filter should contain enclosing parenthesis. For instance cn={input} should be (cn={input})"))
 	}
-
-	if configuration.UsernameAttribute == "" {
-		validator.Push(errors.New("Please provide a username attribute with `username_attribute`"))
-	}
 }
 
 func setDefaultImplementationActiveDirectoryLdapAuthenticationBackend(configuration *schema.LDAPAuthenticationBackendConfiguration) {

internal/configuration/validator/authentication_test.go

@@ -214,6 +214,18 @@ func (suite *LdapAuthenticationBackendSuite) TestShouldValidateCompleteConfigura
 	suite.Assert().False(suite.validator.HasErrors())
 }
 
+func (suite *LdapAuthenticationBackendSuite) TestShouldValidateDefaultImplementationAndUsernameAttribute() {
+	suite.configuration.Ldap.Implementation = ""
+	suite.configuration.Ldap.UsernameAttribute = ""
+	ValidateAuthenticationBackend(&suite.configuration, suite.validator)
+
+	suite.Assert().Equal(schema.LDAPImplementationCustom, suite.configuration.Ldap.Implementation)
+
+	suite.Assert().Equal(suite.configuration.Ldap.UsernameAttribute, schema.DefaultLDAPAuthenticationBackendConfiguration.UsernameAttribute)
+	suite.Assert().False(suite.validator.HasWarnings())
+	suite.Assert().False(suite.validator.HasErrors())
+}
+
 func (suite *LdapAuthenticationBackendSuite) TestShouldRaiseErrorWhenImplementationIsInvalidMSAD() {
 	suite.configuration.Ldap.Implementation = "masd"
 

internal/configuration/validator/const.go

@@ -1,5 +1,7 @@
 package validator
 
+var validRequestMethods = []string{"GET", "HEAD", "POST", "PUT", "PATCH", "DELETE", "TRACE", "CONNECT", "OPTIONS"}
+
 var validKeys = []string{
 	// Root Keys.
 	"host",
@@ -170,6 +172,7 @@ var specificErrorKeys = map[string]string{
 }
 
 const denyPolicy = "deny"
+const bypassPolicy = "bypass"
 
 const argon2id = "argon2id"
 const sha512 = "sha512"
@@ -187,3 +190,5 @@ const testLDAPUser = "user"
 const testModeDisabled = "disable"
 const testTLSCert = "/tmp/cert.pem"
 const testTLSKey = "/tmp/key.pem"
+
+const errAccessControlInvalidPolicyWithSubjects = "Policy [bypass] for domain %s with subjects %s is invalid. It is not supported to configure both policy bypass and subjects. For more information see: https://www.authelia.com/docs/configuration/access-control.html#combining-subjects-and-the-bypass-policy"

internal/configuration/validator/regulation_test.go

@@ -38,8 +38,22 @@ func TestShouldRaiseErrorWhenFindTimeLessThanBanTime(t *testing.T) {
 	config := newDefaultRegulationConfig()
 	config.FindTime = "1m"
 	config.BanTime = "10s"
+
 	ValidateRegulation(&config, validator)
 
 	assert.Len(t, validator.Errors(), 1)
 	assert.EqualError(t, validator.Errors()[0], "find_time cannot be greater than ban_time")
 }
+
+func TestShouldRaiseErrorOnBadDurationStrings(t *testing.T) {
+	validator := schema.NewStructValidator()
+	config := newDefaultRegulationConfig()
+	config.FindTime = "a year"
+	config.BanTime = "forever"
+
+	ValidateRegulation(&config, validator)
+
+	assert.Len(t, validator.Errors(), 2)
+	assert.EqualError(t, validator.Errors()[0], "Error occurred parsing regulation find_time string: Could not convert the input string of a year into a duration")
+	assert.EqualError(t, validator.Errors()[1], "Error occurred parsing regulation ban_time string: Could not convert the input string of forever into a duration")
+}

internal/handlers/handler_firstfactor.go

@@ -188,6 +188,6 @@ func FirstFactorPost(msInitialDelay time.Duration, delayEnabled bool) middleware
 
 		successful = true
 
-		Handle1FAResponse(ctx, bodyJSON.TargetURL, userSession.Username, userSession.Groups)
+		Handle1FAResponse(ctx, bodyJSON.TargetURL, bodyJSON.RequestMethod, userSession.Username, userSession.Groups)
 	}
 }

internal/handlers/handler_firstfactor_test.go

@@ -210,6 +210,7 @@ func (s *FirstFactorSuite) TestShouldAuthenticateUserWithRememberMeUnchecked() {
 	s.mock.Ctx.Request.SetBodyString(`{
 		"username": "test",
 		"password": "hello",
+		"requestMethod": "GET",
 		"keepMeLoggedIn": false
 	}`)
 	FirstFactorPost(0, false)(s.mock.Ctx)
@@ -253,6 +254,7 @@ func (s *FirstFactorSuite) TestShouldSaveUsernameFromAuthenticationBackendInSess
 	s.mock.Ctx.Request.SetBodyString(`{
 		"username": "test",
 		"password": "hello",
+		"requestMethod": "GET",
 		"keepMeLoggedIn": true
 	}`)
 	FirstFactorPost(0, false)(s.mock.Ctx)
@@ -323,6 +325,7 @@ func (s *FirstFactorRedirectionSuite) TestShouldRedirectToDefaultURLWhenNoTarget
 	s.mock.Ctx.Request.SetBodyString(`{
 		"username": "test",
 		"password": "hello",
+		"requestMethod": "GET",
 		"keepMeLoggedIn": false
 	}`)
 	FirstFactorPost(0, false)(s.mock.Ctx)
@@ -341,6 +344,7 @@ func (s *FirstFactorRedirectionSuite) TestShouldRedirectToDefaultURLWhenURLIsUns
 	s.mock.Ctx.Request.SetBodyString(`{
 		"username": "test",
 		"password": "hello",
+		"requestMethod": "GET",
 		"keepMeLoggedIn": false,
 		"targetURL": "http://notsafe.local"
 	}`)
@@ -362,6 +366,7 @@ func (s *FirstFactorRedirectionSuite) TestShouldReply200WhenNoTargetURLProvidedA
 	s.mock.Ctx.Request.SetBodyString(`{
 		"username": "test",
 		"password": "hello",
+		"requestMethod": "GET",
 		"keepMeLoggedIn": false
 	}`)
 
@@ -392,6 +397,7 @@ func (s *FirstFactorRedirectionSuite) TestShouldReply200WhenUnsafeTargetURLProvi
 	s.mock.Ctx.Request.SetBodyString(`{
 		"username": "test",
 		"password": "hello",
+		"requestMethod": "GET",
 		"keepMeLoggedIn": false
 	}`)
 

internal/handlers/handler_verify.go

@@ -98,12 +98,14 @@ func parseBasicAuth(header, auth string) (username, password string, err error)
 
 // isTargetURLAuthorized check whether the given user is authorized to access the resource.
 func isTargetURLAuthorized(authorizer *authorization.Authorizer, targetURL url.URL,
-	username string, userGroups []string, clientIP net.IP, authLevel authentication.Level) authorizationMatching {
+	username string, userGroups []string, clientIP net.IP, method []byte, authLevel authentication.Level) authorizationMatching {
-	level := authorizer.GetRequiredLevel(authorization.Subject{
+	level := authorizer.GetRequiredLevel(
-		Username: username,
+		authorization.Subject{
-		Groups:   userGroups,
+			Username: username,
-		IP:       clientIP,
+			Groups:   userGroups,
-	}, targetURL)
+			IP:       clientIP,
+		},
+		authorization.NewObjectRaw(&targetURL, method))
 
 	switch {
 	case level == authorization.Bypass:
@@ -233,7 +235,7 @@ func verifySessionCookie(ctx *middlewares.AutheliaCtx, targetURL *url.URL, userS
 	return userSession.Username, userSession.DisplayName, userSession.Groups, userSession.Emails, userSession.AuthenticationLevel, nil
 }
 
-func handleUnauthorized(ctx *middlewares.AutheliaCtx, targetURL fmt.Stringer, isBasicAuth bool, username string) {
+func handleUnauthorized(ctx *middlewares.AutheliaCtx, targetURL fmt.Stringer, isBasicAuth bool, username string, method []byte) {
 	if isBasicAuth {
 		ctx.Logger.Infof("Access to %s is not authorized to user %s, sending 401 response with basic auth header", targetURL.String(), username)
 		ctx.ReplyUnauthorized()
@@ -246,17 +248,28 @@ func handleUnauthorized(ctx *middlewares.AutheliaCtx, targetURL fmt.Stringer, is
 	// endpoint to provide the URL of the login portal. The target URL of the user
 	// is computed from X-Forwarded-* headers or X-Original-URL.
 	rd := string(ctx.QueryArgs().Peek("rd"))
+	rm := string(method)
+
+	friendlyMethod := "unknown"
+
+	if rm != "" {
+		friendlyMethod = rm
+	}
+
 	if rd != "" {
-		redirectionURL := fmt.Sprintf("%s?rd=%s", rd, url.QueryEscape(targetURL.String()))
+		redirectionURL := ""
-		if strings.Contains(redirectionURL, "/%23/") {
+
-			ctx.Logger.Warn("Characters /%23/ have been detected in redirection URL. This is not needed anymore, please strip it")
+		if rm != "" {
+			redirectionURL = fmt.Sprintf("%s?rd=%s&rm=%s", rd, url.QueryEscape(targetURL.String()), rm)
+		} else {
+			redirectionURL = fmt.Sprintf("%s?rd=%s", rd, url.QueryEscape(targetURL.String()))
 		}
 
-		ctx.Logger.Infof("Access to %s is not authorized to user %s, redirecting to %s", targetURL.String(), username, redirectionURL)
+		ctx.Logger.Infof("Access to %s (method %s) is not authorized to user %s, redirecting to %s", targetURL.String(), friendlyMethod, username, redirectionURL)
 		ctx.Redirect(redirectionURL, 302)
 		ctx.SetBodyString(fmt.Sprintf("Found. Redirecting to %s", redirectionURL))
 	} else {
-		ctx.Logger.Infof("Access to %s is not authorized to user %s, sending 401 response", targetURL.String(), username)
+		ctx.Logger.Infof("Access to %s (method %s) is not authorized to user %s, sending 401 response", targetURL.String(), friendlyMethod, username)
 		ctx.ReplyUnauthorized()
 	}
 }
@@ -475,6 +488,8 @@ func VerifyGet(cfg schema.AuthenticationBackendConfiguration) middlewares.Reques
 
 		isBasicAuth, username, name, groups, emails, authLevel, err := verifyAuth(ctx, targetURL, refreshProfile, refreshProfileInterval)
 
+		method := ctx.XForwardedMethod()
+
 		if err != nil {
 			ctx.Logger.Error(fmt.Sprintf("Error caught when verifying user authorization: %s", err))
 
@@ -483,20 +498,20 @@ func VerifyGet(cfg schema.AuthenticationBackendConfiguration) middlewares.Reques
 				return
 			}
 
-			handleUnauthorized(ctx, targetURL, isBasicAuth, username)
+			handleUnauthorized(ctx, targetURL, isBasicAuth, username, method)
 
 			return
 		}
 
-		authorization := isTargetURLAuthorized(ctx.Providers.Authorizer, *targetURL, username,
+		authorized := isTargetURLAuthorized(ctx.Providers.Authorizer, *targetURL, username,
-			groups, ctx.RemoteIP(), authLevel)
+			groups, ctx.RemoteIP(), method, authLevel)
 
-		switch authorization {
+		switch authorized {
 		case Forbidden:
 			ctx.Logger.Infof("Access to %s is forbidden to user %s", targetURL.String(), username)
 			ctx.ReplyForbidden()
 		case NotAuthorized:
-			handleUnauthorized(ctx, targetURL, isBasicAuth, username)
+			handleUnauthorized(ctx, targetURL, isBasicAuth, username, method)
 		case Authorized:
 			setForwardedHeaders(&ctx.Response.Header, username, name, groups, emails)
 		}

internal/handlers/handler_verify_test.go

@@ -196,7 +196,7 @@ func TestShouldCheckAuthorizationMatching(t *testing.T) {
 			username = testUsername
 		}
 
-		matching := isTargetURLAuthorized(authorizer, *url, username, []string{}, net.ParseIP("127.0.0.1"), rule.AuthLevel)
+		matching := isTargetURLAuthorized(authorizer, *url, username, []string{}, net.ParseIP("127.0.0.1"), []byte("GET"), rule.AuthLevel)
 		assert.Equal(t, rule.ExpectedMatching, matching, "policy=%s, authLevel=%v, expected=%v, actual=%v",
 			rule.Policy, rule.AuthLevel, rule.ExpectedMatching, matching)
 	}
@@ -762,10 +762,11 @@ func TestShouldRedirectWhenSessionInactiveForTooLongAndRDParamProvided(t *testin
 
 	mock.Ctx.QueryArgs().Add("rd", "https://login.example.com")
 	mock.Ctx.Request.Header.Set("X-Original-URL", "https://two-factor.example.com")
+	mock.Ctx.Request.Header.Set("X-Forwarded-Method", "GET")
 
 	VerifyGet(verifyGetCfg)(mock.Ctx)
 
-	assert.Equal(t, "Found. Redirecting to https://login.example.com?rd=https%3A%2F%2Ftwo-factor.example.com",
+	assert.Equal(t, "Found. Redirecting to https://login.example.com?rd=https%3A%2F%2Ftwo-factor.example.com&rm=GET",
 		string(mock.Ctx.Response.Body()))
 	assert.Equal(t, 302, mock.Ctx.Response.StatusCode())
 

internal/handlers/response.go

@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ import (
 )
 
 // Handle1FAResponse handle the redirection upon 1FA authentication.
-func Handle1FAResponse(ctx *middlewares.AutheliaCtx, targetURI string, username string, groups []string) {
+func Handle1FAResponse(ctx *middlewares.AutheliaCtx, targetURI, requestMethod string, username string, groups []string) {
 	if targetURI == "" {
 		if !ctx.Providers.Authorizer.IsSecondFactorEnabled() && ctx.Configuration.DefaultRedirectionURL != "" {
 			err := ctx.SetJSONBody(redirectResponse{Redirect: ctx.Configuration.DefaultRedirectionURL})
@@ -32,11 +32,13 @@ func Handle1FAResponse(ctx *middlewares.AutheliaCtx, targetURI string, username
 		return
 	}
 
-	requiredLevel := ctx.Providers.Authorizer.GetRequiredLevel(authorization.Subject{
+	requiredLevel := ctx.Providers.Authorizer.GetRequiredLevel(
-		Username: username,
+		authorization.Subject{
-		Groups:   groups,
+			Username: username,
-		IP:       ctx.RemoteIP(),
+			Groups:   groups,
-	}, *targetURL)
+			IP:       ctx.RemoteIP(),
+		},
+		authorization.NewObject(targetURL, requestMethod))
 
 	ctx.Logger.Debugf("Required level for the URL %s is %d", targetURI, requiredLevel)
 

internal/handlers/types.go

@@ -42,14 +42,15 @@ type signDuoRequestBody struct {
 	TargetURL string `json:"targetURL"`
 }
 
-// firstFactorBody represents the JSON body received by the endpoint.
+// firstFactorRequestBody represents the JSON body received by the endpoint.
 type firstFactorRequestBody struct {
-	Username  string `json:"username" valid:"required"`
+	Username       string `json:"username" valid:"required"`
-	Password  string `json:"password" valid:"required"`
+	Password       string `json:"password" valid:"required"`
-	TargetURL string `json:"targetURL"`
+	TargetURL      string `json:"targetURL"`
-	// Cannot require this field because of https://github.com/asaskevich/govalidator/pull/329
+	RequestMethod  string `json:"requestMethod"`
+	KeepMeLoggedIn *bool  `json:"keepMeLoggedIn"`
+	// KeepMeLoggedIn: Cannot require this field because of https://github.com/asaskevich/govalidator/pull/329
 	// TODO(c.michaud): add required validation once the above PR is merged.
-	KeepMeLoggedIn *bool `json:"keepMeLoggedIn"`
 }
 
 // redirectResponse represent the response sent by the first factor endpoint

internal/middlewares/authelia_context.go

@@ -87,22 +87,27 @@ func (c *AutheliaCtx) ReplyForbidden() {
 	c.RequestCtx.Error(fasthttp.StatusMessage(fasthttp.StatusForbidden), fasthttp.StatusForbidden)
 }
 
-// XForwardedProto return the content of the header X-Forwarded-Proto.
+// XForwardedProto return the content of the X-Forwarded-Proto header.
 func (c *AutheliaCtx) XForwardedProto() []byte {
 	return c.RequestCtx.Request.Header.Peek(xForwardedProtoHeader)
 }
 
-// XForwardedHost return the content of the header X-Forwarded-Host.
+// XForwardedMethod return the content of the X-Forwarded-Method header.
+func (c *AutheliaCtx) XForwardedMethod() []byte {
+	return c.RequestCtx.Request.Header.Peek(xForwardedMethodHeader)
+}
+
+// XForwardedHost return the content of the X-Forwarded-Host header.
 func (c *AutheliaCtx) XForwardedHost() []byte {
 	return c.RequestCtx.Request.Header.Peek(xForwardedHostHeader)
 }
 
-// XForwardedURI return the content of the header X-Forwarded-URI.
+// XForwardedURI return the content of the X-Forwarded-URI header.
 func (c *AutheliaCtx) XForwardedURI() []byte {
 	return c.RequestCtx.Request.Header.Peek(xForwardedURIHeader)
 }
 
-// XOriginalURL return the content of the header X-Original-URL.
+// XOriginalURL return the content of the X-Original-URL header.
 func (c *AutheliaCtx) XOriginalURL() []byte {
 	return c.RequestCtx.Request.Header.Peek(xOriginalURLHeader)
 }

internal/middlewares/const.go

@@ -3,6 +3,7 @@ package middlewares
 const jwtIssuer = "Authelia"
 
 const xForwardedProtoHeader = "X-Forwarded-Proto"
+const xForwardedMethodHeader = "X-Forwarded-Method"
 const xForwardedHostHeader = "X-Forwarded-Host"
 const xForwardedURIHeader = "X-Forwarded-URI"
 

internal/suites/Standalone/configuration.yml

@@ -35,6 +35,11 @@ access_control:
     - domain: public.example.com
       policy: bypass
 
+    - domain: secure.example.com
+      policy: bypass
+      methods:
+        - OPTIONS
+
     - domain: secure.example.com
       policy: two_factor
 

internal/suites/example/compose/haproxy/haproxy.cfg

@@ -28,6 +28,16 @@ frontend fe_http
     http-request set-var(req.scheme) str(https) if { ssl_fc }
     http-request set-var(req.scheme) str(http) if !{ ssl_fc }
     http-request set-var(req.questionmark) str(?) if { query -m found }
+    http-request set-var(req.method) str(CONNECT) if { method CONNECT }
+    http-request set-var(req.method) str(GET) if { method GET }
+    http-request set-var(req.method) str(HEAD) if { method HEAD }
+    http-request set-var(req.method) str(OPTIONS) if { method OPTIONS }
+    http-request set-var(req.method) str(POST) if { method POST }
+    http-request set-var(req.method) str(TRACE) if { method TRACE }
+    http-request set-var(req.method) str(PUT) if { method PUT }
+    http-request set-var(req.method) str(PATCH) if { method PATCH }
+    http-request set-var(req.method) str(DELETE) if { method DELETE }
+    http-request set-header X-Forwarded-Method %[var(req.method)]
 
     http-request set-header X-Real-IP %[src]
     http-request set-header X-Forwarded-Proto %[var(req.scheme)]

internal/suites/example/compose/nginx/portal/nginx.conf

@@ -152,10 +152,10 @@ http {
             # See https://expressjs.com/en/guide/behind-proxies.html
             proxy_set_header            X-Original-URL $scheme://$http_host$request_uri;
 
+            proxy_set_header            X-Forwarded-Method $request_method;
             proxy_set_header            X-Forwarded-Proto $scheme;
             proxy_set_header            X-Forwarded-Host $http_host;
             proxy_set_header            X-Forwarded-URI $request_uri;
-            
             proxy_set_header            X-Forwarded-For $proxy_add_x_forwarded_for;
 
             # Authelia can receive Proxy-Authorization to authenticate however most of the clients

internal/suites/suite_standalone_test.go

@@ -103,6 +103,31 @@ func NewStandaloneSuite() *StandaloneSuite {
 	return &StandaloneSuite{}
 }
 
+func (s *StandaloneSuite) TestShouldRespectMethodsACL() {
+	req, err := http.NewRequest("GET", fmt.Sprintf("%s/api/verify?rd=%s", AutheliaBaseURL, GetLoginBaseURL()), nil)
+	s.Assert().NoError(err)
+	req.Header.Set("X-Forwarded-Method", "GET")
+	req.Header.Set("X-Forwarded-Proto", "https")
+	req.Header.Set("X-Forwarded-Host", fmt.Sprintf("secure.%s", BaseDomain))
+	req.Header.Set("X-Forwarded-URI", "/")
+
+	client := NewHTTPClient()
+	res, err := client.Do(req)
+	s.Assert().NoError(err)
+	s.Assert().Equal(res.StatusCode, 302)
+	body, err := ioutil.ReadAll(res.Body)
+	s.Assert().NoError(err)
+
+	urlEncodedAdminURL := url.QueryEscape(SecureBaseURL + "/")
+	s.Assert().Equal(fmt.Sprintf("Found. Redirecting to %s?rd=%s&rm=GET", GetLoginBaseURL(), urlEncodedAdminURL), string(body))
+
+	req.Header.Set("X-Forwarded-Method", "OPTIONS")
+
+	res, err = client.Do(req)
+	s.Assert().NoError(err)
+	s.Assert().Equal(res.StatusCode, 200)
+}
+
 // Standard case using nginx.
 func (s *StandaloneSuite) TestShouldVerifyAPIVerifyUnauthorize() {
 	req, err := http.NewRequest("GET", fmt.Sprintf("%s/api/verify", AutheliaBaseURL), nil)

internal/utils/certificates.go

@@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ func NewTLSConfig(config *schema.TLSConfig, defaultMinVersion uint16, certPool *
 func NewX509CertPool(directory string, config *schema.Configuration) (certPool *x509.CertPool, errors []error, nonFatalErrors []error) {
 	certPool, err := x509.SystemCertPool()
 	if err != nil {
-		nonFatalErrors = append(nonFatalErrors, fmt.Errorf("could not load system certificate pool which may result in untruested certificate issues: %v", err))
+		nonFatalErrors = append(nonFatalErrors, fmt.Errorf("could not load system certificate pool which may result in untrusted certificate issues: %v", err))
 		certPool = x509.NewCertPool()
 	}
 

internal/utils/strings.go

@@ -18,9 +18,9 @@ func IsStringAlphaNumeric(input string) bool {
 	return true
 }
 
-// IsStringInSlice checks if a single string is in an array of strings.
+// IsStringInSlice checks if a single string is in a slice of strings.
-func IsStringInSlice(a string, list []string) (inSlice bool) {
+func IsStringInSlice(a string, slice []string) (inSlice bool) {
-	for _, b := range list {
+	for _, b := range slice {
 		if b == a {
 			return true
 		}
@@ -29,6 +29,17 @@ func IsStringInSlice(a string, list []string) (inSlice bool) {
 	return false
 }
 
+// IsStringInSliceFold checks if a single string is in a slice of strings but uses strings.EqualFold to compare them.
+func IsStringInSliceFold(a string, slice []string) (inSlice bool) {
+	for _, b := range slice {
+		if strings.EqualFold(b, a) {
+			return true
+		}
+	}
+
+	return false
+}
+
 // IsStringInSliceContains checks if a single string is in an array of strings.
 func IsStringInSliceContains(a string, list []string) (inSlice bool) {
 	for _, b := range list {

internal/utils/strings_test.go

@@ -9,7 +9,9 @@ import (
 
 func TestShouldSplitIntoEvenStringsOfFour(t *testing.T) {
 	input := testStringInput
+
 	arrayOfStrings := SliceString(input, 4)
+
 	assert.Equal(t, len(arrayOfStrings), 3)
 	assert.Equal(t, "abcd", arrayOfStrings[0])
 	assert.Equal(t, "efgh", arrayOfStrings[1])
@@ -18,7 +20,9 @@ func TestShouldSplitIntoEvenStringsOfFour(t *testing.T) {
 
 func TestShouldSplitIntoEvenStringsOfOne(t *testing.T) {
 	input := testStringInput
+
 	arrayOfStrings := SliceString(input, 1)
+
 	assert.Equal(t, 12, len(arrayOfStrings))
 	assert.Equal(t, "a", arrayOfStrings[0])
 	assert.Equal(t, "b", arrayOfStrings[1])
@@ -29,7 +33,9 @@ func TestShouldSplitIntoEvenStringsOfOne(t *testing.T) {
 
 func TestShouldSplitIntoUnevenStringsOfFour(t *testing.T) {
 	input := testStringInput + "m"
+
 	arrayOfStrings := SliceString(input, 4)
+
 	assert.Equal(t, len(arrayOfStrings), 4)
 	assert.Equal(t, "abcd", arrayOfStrings[0])
 	assert.Equal(t, "efgh", arrayOfStrings[1])
@@ -40,7 +46,9 @@ func TestShouldSplitIntoUnevenStringsOfFour(t *testing.T) {
 func TestShouldFindSliceDifferencesDelta(t *testing.T) {
 	before := []string{"abc", "onetwothree"}
 	after := []string{"abc", "xyz"}
+
 	added, removed := StringSlicesDelta(before, after)
+
 	require.Len(t, added, 1)
 	require.Len(t, removed, 1)
 	assert.Equal(t, "onetwothree", removed[0])
@@ -50,7 +58,9 @@ func TestShouldFindSliceDifferencesDelta(t *testing.T) {
 func TestShouldNotFindSliceDifferencesDelta(t *testing.T) {
 	before := []string{"abc", "onetwothree"}
 	after := []string{"abc", "onetwothree"}
+
 	added, removed := StringSlicesDelta(before, after)
+
 	require.Len(t, added, 0)
 	require.Len(t, removed, 0)
 }
@@ -58,34 +68,52 @@ func TestShouldNotFindSliceDifferencesDelta(t *testing.T) {
 func TestShouldFindSliceDifferences(t *testing.T) {
 	a := []string{"abc", "onetwothree"}
 	b := []string{"abc", "xyz"}
-	diff := IsStringSlicesDifferent(a, b)
+
-	assert.True(t, diff)
+	assert.True(t, IsStringSlicesDifferent(a, b))
 }
 
 func TestShouldNotFindSliceDifferences(t *testing.T) {
 	a := []string{"abc", "onetwothree"}
 	b := []string{"abc", "onetwothree"}
-	diff := IsStringSlicesDifferent(a, b)
+
-	assert.False(t, diff)
+	assert.False(t, IsStringSlicesDifferent(a, b))
 }
 
 func TestShouldFindSliceDifferenceWhenDifferentLength(t *testing.T) {
 	a := []string{"abc", "onetwothree"}
 	b := []string{"abc", "onetwothree", "more"}
-	diff := IsStringSlicesDifferent(a, b)
+
-	assert.True(t, diff)
+	assert.True(t, IsStringSlicesDifferent(a, b))
 }
 
 func TestShouldFindStringInSliceContains(t *testing.T) {
 	a := "abc"
-	b := []string{"abc", "onetwothree"}
+	slice := []string{"abc", "onetwothree"}
-	s := IsStringInSliceContains(a, b)
+
-	assert.True(t, s)
+	assert.True(t, IsStringInSliceContains(a, slice))
 }
 
 func TestShouldNotFindStringInSliceContains(t *testing.T) {
 	a := "xyz"
-	b := []string{"abc", "onetwothree"}
+	slice := []string{"abc", "onetwothree"}
-	s := IsStringInSliceContains(a, b)
+
-	assert.False(t, s)
+	assert.False(t, IsStringInSliceContains(a, slice))
+}
+
+func TestShouldFindStringInSliceFold(t *testing.T) {
+	a := "xYz"
+	b := "AbC"
+	slice := []string{"XYz", "abc"}
+
+	assert.True(t, IsStringInSliceFold(a, slice))
+	assert.True(t, IsStringInSliceFold(b, slice))
+}
+
+func TestShouldNotFindStringInSliceFold(t *testing.T) {
+	a := "xyZ"
+	b := "ABc"
+	slice := []string{"cba", "zyx"}
+
+	assert.False(t, IsStringInSliceFold(a, slice))
+	assert.False(t, IsStringInSliceFold(b, slice))
 }

web/src/hooks/RequestMethod.ts

@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
+import queryString from "query-string";
+import { useLocation } from "react-router";
+
+export function useRequestMethod() {
+    const location = useLocation();
+    const queryParams = queryString.parse(location.search);
+    return queryParams && "rm" in queryParams ? (queryParams["rm"] as string) : undefined;
+}

web/src/services/FirstFactor.ts

@@ -7,9 +7,16 @@ interface PostFirstFactorBody {
     password: string;
     keepMeLoggedIn: boolean;
     targetURL?: string;
+    requestMethod?: string;
 }
 
-export async function postFirstFactor(username: string, password: string, rememberMe: boolean, targetURL?: string) {
+export async function postFirstFactor(
+    username: string,
+    password: string,
+    rememberMe: boolean,
+    targetURL?: string,
+    requestMethod?: string,
+) {
     const data: PostFirstFactorBody = {
         username,
         password,
@@ -19,6 +26,11 @@ export async function postFirstFactor(username: string, password: string, rememb
     if (targetURL) {
         data.targetURL = targetURL;
     }
+
+    if (requestMethod) {
+        data.requestMethod = requestMethod;
+    }
+
     const res = await PostWithOptionalResponse<SignInResponse>(FirstFactorPath, data);
     return res ? res : ({} as SignInResponse);
 }

web/src/views/LoginPortal/FirstFactor/FirstFactorForm.tsx

@@ -7,6 +7,7 @@ import { useHistory } from "react-router";
 import FixedTextField from "../../../components/FixedTextField";
 import { useNotifications } from "../../../hooks/NotificationsContext";
 import { useRedirectionURL } from "../../../hooks/RedirectionURL";
+import { useRequestMethod } from "../../../hooks/RequestMethod";
 import LoginLayout from "../../../layouts/LoginLayout";
 import { ResetPasswordStep1Route } from "../../../Routes";
 import { postFirstFactor } from "../../../services/FirstFactor";
@@ -25,6 +26,7 @@ const FirstFactorForm = function (props: Props) {
     const style = useStyles();
     const history = useHistory();
     const redirectionURL = useRedirectionURL();
+    const requestMethod = useRequestMethod();
 
     const [rememberMe, setRememberMe] = useState(false);
     const [username, setUsername] = useState("");
@@ -60,7 +62,7 @@ const FirstFactorForm = function (props: Props) {
 
         props.onAuthenticationStart();
         try {
-            const res = await postFirstFactor(username, password, rememberMe, redirectionURL);
+            const res = await postFirstFactor(username, password, rememberMe, redirectionURL, requestMethod);
             props.onAuthenticationSuccess(res ? res.redirect : undefined);
         } catch (err) {
             console.error(err);

web/src/views/LoginPortal/LoginPortal.tsx

@@ -5,6 +5,7 @@ import { Switch, Route, Redirect, useHistory, useLocation } from "react-router";
 import { useConfiguration } from "../../hooks/Configuration";
 import { useNotifications } from "../../hooks/NotificationsContext";
 import { useRedirectionURL } from "../../hooks/RedirectionURL";
+import { useRequestMethod } from "../../hooks/RequestMethod";
 import { useAutheliaState } from "../../hooks/State";
 import { useUserPreferences as userUserInfo } from "../../hooks/UserInfo";
 import { SecondFactorMethod } from "../../models/Methods";
@@ -31,6 +32,7 @@ const LoginPortal = function (props: Props) {
     const history = useHistory();
     const location = useLocation();
     const redirectionURL = useRedirectionURL();
+    const requestMethod = useRequestMethod();
     const { createErrorNotification } = useNotifications();
     const [firstFactorDisabled, setFirstFactorDisabled] = useState(true);
 
@@ -84,7 +86,9 @@ const LoginPortal = function (props: Props) {
     // Redirect to the correct stage if not enough authenticated
     useEffect(() => {
         if (state) {
-            const redirectionSuffix = redirectionURL ? `?rd=${encodeURIComponent(redirectionURL)}` : "";
+            const redirectionSuffix = redirectionURL
+                ? `?rd=${encodeURIComponent(redirectionURL)}${requestMethod ? `&rm=${requestMethod}` : ""}`
+                : "";
 
             if (state.authentication_level === AuthenticationLevel.Unauthenticated) {
                 setFirstFactorDisabled(false);
@@ -103,7 +107,7 @@ const LoginPortal = function (props: Props) {
                 }
             }
         }
-    }, [state, redirectionURL, redirect, userInfo, setFirstFactorDisabled, configuration]);
+    }, [state, redirectionURL, requestMethod, redirect, userInfo, setFirstFactorDisabled, configuration]);
 
     const handleAuthSuccess = async (redirectionURL: string | undefined) => {
         if (redirectionURL) {